Consciousness and Morality Evolved B4 h

Consciousness and Morality Evolved BEFORE Humans

Moral Math of Social Animal Nature Involves 3 Egos and 3 Ego’s “Moral Codes”

All reality can be broken down into 3 basic things.

Everything is energy, fundamentally. Break it down to smallest or most fundamental level, and you have a SINGLE UNIT of energy.
A moral code (natural law) exists that causes energy to act in certain way.
Multiple units of energy “ego” is formed. Energy in the most basic form was acted upon by a moral code (natural law) and it caused the energy to clump together and form an ego.

Physics, Evolution Animal Body, and Evolution Animal Soul

The 3 main ego moral codes that determine Human morality are: physics ego, evolution body ego, and evolution soul ego.

Physics-Ego: Our visible universe is the ego that everyone lives in. The (radius) moral code of our universal ego, is physics.
Evolution Body- Ego: The animal body, regardless of what species of animal, can be viewed as “a bubble of energy” that is in the shape it is due to its MORAL CODE evolution. The moral code of the human body ego is our primal brain, which is similar to the lobster stage of evolution. The primal brain is designed to survive now and is ONLY able to create win-lose situations.
Evolution Soul- Ego: Social animals have an EVOLVED soul found in the frontal lobe, which is made of emotional energy. The emotional energy is to incentivize the species members to create win-win relationships to increase their ability to survive and thrive. Social animal nature 100% cannot happen without CONSCIOUSNESS “at some number above zero” which means that consciousness” is just PROACTIVE problem solved, instead of the lobster evolution stage, which is REACTING to problems facing their survival.

Moral Math of social animal nature involves 3 different moral codes, for 3 different egos that all interact with one another. The more optimally an individual can correctly integrate the 3 egos, the more efficient their life becomes, which is the only way to max out an individual’s moral potential for their life.

The amount of that “moral potential” that they use, is up to them. Their body ego and soul ego’s “overall max potential” is set from a gene’s and “where in space time” that individual is born. The amount of overall max potential that that individual uses is up to them and is based on; the moral principles, mindset and worldview they have, their ambition level, how much training they do, the degree of efficiency that their training is (bad training makes you worse), etc.

Real morality deals with real facts that are known. Real morality for humans is FINITE. Humans cannot choose options that do not exist. All animals that exist in physics reality have to 24/7 pay the physics tax to be alive. All social animals have an objective moral code for their body ego and soul ego. These moral codes are necessary for the social animal to continuously pay the physics reality life tax. All animals that go against physics and evolution’s moral codes become extinct.

Metaphorically speaking, when it comes to morality; physics is god (game maker), evolution is the only true “life flourishing” prophet (games referee), and the individual’s personal moral code (society, time period, etc. are all factored into the individuals personal moral code) is used to integrate themselves into the game as successfully as can.

Physics Ego = visible objective universe and its God “physics” which sets the moral code.
Animal Body Ego = Animal body ego and God’s “only objectively true-life messenger/prophet-evolution” which sets the objective human life furthering moral code
Soul Ego = Social animal evolved soul ego and God’s “only objectively true-life messenger/prophet-evolution” which sets the objective human life furthering moral code.

Optimal morality at the Theoretical Human (overall species) level begins with physics, then evolution’s body ego, and lastly evolutions internal conscious emotionally self-aware ego.
Optimal morality for every individual starts with the soul ego, then you integrate with your specific body ego’s abilities and limits, and lastly the individual tries to optimally fuse the internal ego and the body ego in a way that allows the individual to optimally integrate themselves as an individual with physics-based reality, aka Physics ego.

Each Ego and Moral Code in Human Morality Looked at Fundamentally

Only looking at facts of reality. If it does not have facts, then it is not part of real optimal objective human morality.

Everything is energy fundamentally, which is acted upon by a natural law or a moral code, and it causes energy to group together into a bubble of energy called an Ego.

Physics Ego

1st Ego of Real Human Morality= Visible Universe that human’s real reality, consists of. Physics moral code keeps the ego held together.

Evolution Ego Stages in GENERAL SENSE

1st Stage of Evolution = Basic life body ego

The Body of the 1st Living Animal is the 1st ego of organic life form in this solar system. It is still unclear exactly “how 1st life began” but all evidence we have currently demonstrates that evolution is real and objectively factual. All life 100% has to have an objective physics-based nature or it would not survive. Simple as that. You either have an animal moral code that integrates with physics objectively or die.

Primary moral principle that all successful finite, mortal, and organic life has fundamentally at their animal flourishing core is SELFISHNESS. No successful animal species survives and continues surviving unless selfishness me-win minimum moral code foundation. An animal is not trying to cause other animals’ life potential to decrease primary, because an animal’s primary concern is themselves. A physics “24/7 survive tax” is always demanded, so there is a need to make sure that all an animal’s needs are primary met in order to pay the life tax to survive, as well as gather resources that allow the animal to “go beyond mere survival.”
1. Human Morality 100% needs to fundamentally include “me-win” selfishness morality at a minimum, to have a real optimal objectively correct moral code for human flourishing. It must have selfishness in it as a fundamental principle, in some way.

2nd Stage of Evolution. Use Lobster’s 3 egos as example.

body ego.
primal brain ego drive to dominant for optimal moral mating chances.
resource territory ego.

The lobster is a good representative of the evolved animal body ego’s 2nd stage of moral principled development efficiency. Lobsters go into direct hierarchies of mating competition. Male lobsters’ hierarchy for reproductive rights is decided by ability and taking moral accountability for the alpha status (24/7 defend his territory). A species having direct competition among its individuals for mating rights will increase the incentive to win. This incentive leads to an increase in evolutionary drive to be the best moral mating option for the females. This is similar to when technology makes a giant leap forward and a new business takes over after it figured out how to “10x more efficiently process of production in some way” which happens when a problem of efficiency that humans face gets solved or closer to being solved.

The most morally worthy body ego male lobsters get to mate with many females, because females have a moral obligation to do their best to get the best male body ego lobster for their kids to grow up morally integrated with reality to best degree they can. All animals that flourish does so because they have selfishness fundamentally as part of its moral code and that includes lobster females when they are trying to find the optimally moral option for their kids. A mother wants what’s best for her kids. Just because an animal “breathes air” it does not mean that they are entitled to mating rights. Entitled mating rights would be called rape for humans. “Breathing air” does not mean that you are entitled to anything.

Male Lobster

Lobster Body Ego = morality is built on physics moral code and the earliest body ego evolved life forms need to be selfish, as ALL ANIMAL BODY EGOS ARE.

“Primal brain-ish” (located inside body ego) ego = Lobsters have a nervous system that is attuned to hierarchical dominance for mating rights with females. The better it does the more its nervous system rewards it. If the lobster does poorly against other males, then its nervous system becomes depressed. Evolved Life “finds a way” by incentivizing evolutions optimal morality nature and goal.

Morality is about optimally integrating your evolved body ego with physics-based reality, so that you can optimally “live again” vicariously through reproduction of yourself with another of your species.

(outside body ego) Resource Territory Ego = Males demonstrate their moral worthiness to females by finding a “resource territory” ego in reality and then defending it 100% against ALL anti-optimal moral male lobsters.

moral principles of evolution at the most primitive level is selfishness “fight to survive and live longer through reproduction.”
Selective breeding massively increases the quality of kids because now all the anti-moral animal male options get weeded out by physics reality or by optimal males of that species beating them out by demonstrating higher moral mating value.
1. Optimal Alpha male lobsters have 3 main moral duties.
  1. Alpha male lobsters are morally selfish. They desire to survive well and survive again. Only moral energy fighting to survive will.
  2. Alpha male lobsters have a moral duty to female lobsters to be the “Moral Enforcer.” Females focus on reproduction, while the alpha male holds the moral line against all anti-optimal male lobsters who try and take away his reproductive value.
    1. An optimally moral alpha male lobster is 100% petty and ambitious in defending his moral line for his kids mothers and himself.
  3. Alpha male lobsters have a duty to “Theoretical Lobster” in a GTO sense, because if there were no lobster species then his ability to exist would be gone.

Optimal Alpha male lobster’s moral levels

1st foundation of moral lobster code = Physics moral code.
2nd foundation of moral lobster code = Evolutions basic life selfishness.
3rd foundation of moral lobster code = “Evolutions Hierarchy of Mating Worthiness” Male’s primitive brain structure’s ego moral code of desire/need to be “female moral territory hotspot.”
- To become a “female moral territory hotspot” a male must dominate the hierarchy ladder in their environment.
- Establish “female moral mating” territory.
- 100% morally petty and ambitiously enforce optimal moral mating option for females.
  - Female lobsters deserve to have the optimal moral mating options for their kids. When you are all in on something, you desire the optimal moral option.

Female Lobster

Female lobsters do not directly compete against other female lobsters for mating hierarchy dominance, because the alpha male lobsters will reproduce with all female lobsters in his mating territory, regardless their overall exact moral mating value. This means that females in this type of mating species will automatically have a higher species moral value score than the 90% bottom of males, since only a small percent of males do all the reproduction. Females may directly compete for resources at this level, but never for reproduction advantage.

Female Lobster moral code levels

Physics moral code.
Evolution basic life foundational moral principled code of selfishness.
Primitive brained ego and its moral code designed to get the most moral mating male option for their future children. The female lobster is looking for the best “safe harbor ego” to live in and have the optimal mating male option to get DNA from and to defend them from anti-optimal male lobster mating options.

3rd stage of Evolution = Pre-Human Social Animals

Primal Brain Body ego
Mating territory for tribe ego
1. In-group
2. Out-group
Frontal Lobe Soul ego
Social Animal internal ego/soul
1. For-M3
2. Against-M3

Not all social animals are male alpha led. Wolves it's male. Hyena is female. Hyena females have evolved to be larger and more aggressive than male hyenas. The alpha female has a fake penis the other members lick to demonstrate that their egos are submissive to hers. It seems the basic moral math of social animal nature is the same, regardless of male or female alpha led. Humans are social animals where the male of the species is the alpha of the tribe/pack.

Lobsters’ morality started and stopped with the optimal moral males. The alpha male would.

Dominate the hierarchy ladder to demonstrate his moral mating worthiness.
He would establish or take over a mating resource territory.
He is the “moral enforcer” holding the moral line for mating females, by keeping the anti-optimal moral male mating options out and away from the females.
- Females moral code is to optimally focus on mating with optimal moral male and then funneling as many resources to her kids potential as possible.

Alpha male lobsters have a territory where they are the only male and then they enforce that moral code on every other male lobster that tries to get to their females. Lobster moral male mating options work alone.

Social Animals Change Evolution Strategy By Bringing In The Anti-Optimal Males into the “mating territory ego” In Hopes that “Win-Win” is More moral than “win-lose”

Pre-Human social animals built on top of the previous levels of evolutionary reproductive efficiency advancement “body ego dominance hierarchy” and added another hierarchy of dominance “social tribe’s moral soul status” for males to prove they are an optimal moral male mating option for the females. Social animals evolved to have an internal soul ego to compete on this social status of optimal male mating worthiness. "Pre-human moral hierarchy for social animals” is the hierarchy ladder that integrates the social animal with physics. No morality without life. No life without physics tax- food, shelter, resources, knowledge, defense. The hierarchy ladder makes that process as morally efficient as possible. The “patriarchy ladder” for humans, is effectively “the problem-solving machine” or put differently, it’s the “moral router” that all the tribe members survive thanks to.

No moral production = No morality

Social animal species evolved to emotionally be driven to “raise up/protect/problem solve” for the “1% most vulnerable and moral potential filled members of the tribe” aka babies, pregnant females, and mothers of young. A baby has all its moral potential. Protecting newborn babies is the 100% most instinct based aspect of social animal species. Social animal species are social to increase their evolutionary desire/need/drive to “survive, keep on surviving, and go beyond mere survival” which starts with reproduction efficiency from “birth to death.” Protecting babies, pregnant ladies, and mothers is as fundamental as it gets.

Social animal alphas bring in the anti-optimal mating options into the alpha’s “moral mating resource territory” public ego. This has pros and cons, same as everything. The simplest “con” would be the fact that now the anti-optimal male mating competition is much closer to the females. The “pro” is the fact that there is far more “future society/tribe” overall moral potential, when an alpha has others to work with, as opposed to the lobster that works alone. Lobster males work alone and drive off the anti-optimal males. The lobster’s survival strategy works well to survive, but it does have limits to it. Effectively all anti-optimal male lobster moral potential is discarded by evolution. Only a species that works with other members of its species to achieve greatness can go to the moon. Social animals took on an evolutionary strategy that has a lot more real physics and evolution based moral complicated problems in it to solve, but the overall potential is far greater with “win-win” moral species code verse “win alone” species moral code.

“Win-win” species moral code means that this species canNOT be “reactionary to environmental stimuli and instinct” alone. Working with another individual means that there has to be some proactive thinking/feeling/instinct going on, otherwise it would not be possible to coordinate with each other. Not sure when the switch from “reaction to pro-active social animal” happened exactly, to what degree pre-human social animals are able to be conscious/free will pro-active life strategizing, or if consciousness really is just all emotional-frontal lobe energy that came about through evolution at the social animal stage level. This is what makes conceptual sense from the fundamental moral math of human nature, when you start with the first facts we know and work forward one step at a time, in 100% reason based and honest way.

Consciousness is a result of social animal nature.

Consciousness = Emotional Energy that is Emotionally Sober and Proactive Connecting Points.
- The 2 main parts of consciousness are “proactive life strategizing” and “emotionally sober reason-based clarity” in evaluating information.

Social animal nature could not evolve without consciousness evolving into existence with it to handle the destructive raw potential of emotional energy. Social Animal Evolution’s “Emotional Intensity” and “Emotional Sobriety” are 100% Functionally Linked.

Consciousness is the proactive connection of two points. There are three kinds of “point to point” connection for consciousness. Consciousness can connect two points in a few different ways:

in a straight line
consciousness can form “a confined boundary for a singularity point to explore” similar to “pong ball exploring an empty box.”
A box can form and connect to a “pong ball” exploring outside the box with “guess and check.”

Social Animal Arms Race: Cause and effect.

1990’s example of “increase potential to be moral” vs “increased potential to be anti-moral”

In 1990’s there was a car racing arcade game where you sat in the car seat and turned a real wheel. This game had 3 different “moral/anti-moral potential” levels to choose from for your car (“moral” here means “win the race”).

Basic level = lowest speed potential. Easiest mode to “stay in control of your car.” “Turtle mode” slow but steady in staying on the racecourse.
Moderate level = middle speed potential. Middle mode for “staying in control of your car.”
Pro level = Fastest speed potential. Difficult mode for “staying in control of your car.” “Tasmanian devil cartoon character mode” very fast but it goes all over the place. Highest moral potential and highest anti-moral potential.
1. Emotions are “pro level” moral mode because it has best and worst moral potential.

Social Animal Soul Level 1 Foundation = “Increase Emotions” to “Increase Potential to Survive and Thrive”

Cause = Evolutionary drive to “survive and thrive” follows the incentives of “increased life flourishing potential” caused by “turning up the emotions in social animals.”
- Emotions increase social animal potential for survival and the ability to thrive.
- Emotions increase social animal potential to destroy themselves and others in tribe.

Social Animal Soul Moral Level 2 = “Survival Need” to “Protect Against the Negative Potential Power of Increasing Emotions”

Effect = Evolutionary drive to “protect self and future kids” from all threat potential, including threats caused by a species own fundamental emotional nature. This is why social animals have an evolutionary NEED to evolve the ability to “detach from emotions and objectively think” with an emotionally sober, decision-making mindset. Emotionless, reason-based thinking is needed to protect a social animal’s life and the lives of their kids, from the potential threat posed by EVERY emotionally based social animal, which is ALL OF THEM.
- Social animals need an evolutionary evolved ability that helps social animals to max out their life flourishing potential, which has been increased by the social animal evolved addition of emotions.
- Social animals need an evolved ability that increases their ability to “minimize the destructive anti-life survival potential” caused by emotions.

Social Animal Morality = Life Survival Strategies to address instinct needs of body ego and Emotional Regulatory System that keeps the soul ego "emotionally regular” and not backed up or emotionally constipated.

Physics and evolution have a body and soul ego life tax to survive and one to thrive. There is no way around these physics and evolution taxes.

Three things fundamentally needed for “increasing social animal win-win moral bonding potential”

Emotional intensity = Basically, the more you love or desire something, the more you will fight for it.
Emotional Clarity = Are you going to bond more morally optimal with “an individual you can see 100%” or “an individual that you can’t see” because the emotional fog is 100% solid?
1. Emotions = Dark Side of the Force “Cloud everything”
Emotional Security and Stability = This is the moral code that bonds the individuals to each other individually, as well as tribe members to their tribe. The more efficient a moral code is in creating “long term win-win” bonds, the more secure and stable the bonds will be.
1. Emotions are intense and can cause great moral potential, as well as great chaotic destruction potential. The destruction is ALWAYS going to happen at some point because that is what emotions do, they become “emotionally blacked out and belligerent.” The question is “how will they affect the individual and tribe” and “to what degree of affect do they have.” Emotional destructive potential does not have to be realized if there is a moral regulation system in place to defend against it similar to a dam keeping water at bay.
2. Defending yourself against destructive potential is not enough though, because that emotional energy needs to be used in some way or cleared out of system, because emotions will decay and fester, similar to food. Nothing causes mental illness more than a complete break down or stoppage of an individual’s emotional waste disposal system. The body ego is massively harmed when the digestive system is broken or stopped, and it’s the same thing with the social animal soul’s emotional waste disposal system. All social animals are finite, which means no one does anything perfectly. No matter how efficient a social animal species is, there is always going to need to be a "soul venting emotions off system" in place for all individuals and tribes. Every social animal soul needs to vent off excess waste emotions.

Social animal soul’s “ability to be consciousness” had to evolutionarily increase to “efficiently regulate” its “social animal soul’s emotional input/output system” in order to keep up with that social animal’s 1st principle fundamental natural evolutionary moral strategy to “increase win-win social bonding potential.” Emotional sobriety potential had to increase with the level of emotional intensity potential, otherwise the “emotional destructive potential” would push the animal outside of the limits of evolution’s “survival lasso” that is located in physics ego.

Social Animal Example of Immoral DNA

A species with an “emotional power level” of 100 and an “emotional sobriety ability level” of 5.
There is a high potential chance that one or more social animal species went extinct due to having “immoral DNA” which is “DNA not compatible with physics and evolution life tax.”

No Social Animal Nature Without Ability for “Proactive Living”

Social animal species can survive AND THRIVE. Before animals could only survive or survive barely better. Proactive evolutionary species strategy change creates the “luxury market” possibility. Social animals began the path to consciousness, which increased as social animal species became more and more soul/body ego efficient, until we came to humans. Working with another individual means that there has to be some proactive thinking/feeling/instinct going on, otherwise it would not be possible to coordinate with each other. There are a few possible ways that consciousness and objective reason-based thinking take hold in social animals, evolutionary wise.

Need for Social animals to be Proactive Conscious

(Alpha body ego-Alpha soul ego) A-A’s love for A-A-2.0 = An A-A desires to be an alpha because they love themselves. They want to max out their ability to max out their individual life and the future lives of their kids. In order to max out the potential environment for A-A’s kids, they need to optimally strategize how to work with the other social animals that are in their moral mating territory. If an A-A is to TRULY MAX out his potential to optimally set up his A-A-2.0’s future territory, then that A-A has 100% evolutionary incentive and drive to increase their conscious ability to grab information from environment, from other social animals, and the ability to optimally integrate that information.
A-A’s need to increase his ability to stay worthy of being A-A. = Alpha leader of social animal tribe is judged by their results when it comes to the tribe’s overall survival. A bigger alpha can be driven off by a pack, so the alpha has to produce to maintain their alpha status leadership. The better an alpha is at taking in information about reality and making morally optimal decisions for the tribe’s survival, the better his chances are of maxing out his reproductive chances AND his THRIVING chances, by staying alpha status.
A-A needs A-B “right hand man” = A-A needs to optimize inside the tribe’s territory and outside the tribe’s territory. At some point the A-A needs to delegate some social moral authority otherwise he will get burnt out and lose his status. A-A has multiple moral accountability roles that need to be filled, if he is to optimally do what is needed to stay worthy as an A-A.
1. Inside Tribe Territory Moral Responsibilities of A-A.
  1. Moral Educator.
  2. Moral enforcer
    1. Body-ego moral enforcer
    2. soul moral enforcer
      1. moral currency bank owner
        
        moral currency evaluator
        
        moral network debt/credit
2. Outside Tribe Territory Moral Responsibilities of A-A
  1. Moral Educator
  2. Moral enforcer
    1. Out Group tribal threats defensive strategies
      1. Training for outside territory threats from all animals
  3. Moral resource producer
    1. Scout information
      1. new territory
      2. prey animals
      3. weather
      4. other tribes
      5. etc.
    2. Getting new resources = hunting, gathering, wood, etc.

All non-A-As have all the same incentives that A-A’s have to be proactive conscious when it comes to increasing their ability to survive.
All non-A-As have all the same incentives that A-A’s have to be proactive conscious when it comes to increasing their ability to THRIVE. The only way for a non-A-A member to increase their thriving ability, is through social skill increase and non-social skill increase, which “increased consciousness” would “increase chances of achieving that goal.”
1. All non-A-As need to have some level of skill with social moral communication and currency, because all non-A-A stuff has to run thru A-A minimum, so it is important to have minimum social skill in order to THRIVE.

A-A’s Moral Accountability Price = #1 Optimal Moral Mating Option for Females as Payment

Optimal moral mating male qualities that females look for

Warrior primal brain- For a male to be optimal moral mating choice, they have to have a mindset that confronts life’s problems, regardless how big or impossible a problem. A male that runs away from a problem, is a male that will produce a coward who can’t protect his kids or their mother.
Scholar mindset that seeks to increase its ability to understand reality and problem solve.
Leader of men – Only males who “have the ability to be a leader” can achieve the #1 male mating desirability spot. Leaders also have best access and control over resources, which increases their kid’s survivability potential.

Inside Tribe Territory Moral Responsibilities of A-A

Moral Educator of the moral code that the social animal tribe uses in-group, when in relax mode and the moral code that the tribe uses when it’s not in relax mode.
Moral enforcer
1. Body ego moral enforcer to protect females, kids, mothers, recovering/sleeping tribe members, etc. from anti-optimal males and the occasional female.
2. soul moral enforcer
  1. moral currency bank owner- The A-A has a real total monopoly on the tribe’s Soul currency, because everything runs through him and his A-B/B-A’s. He is the only option in the tribe, CURRENTLY. The tribe can overthrow the A-A and destroy the current tribal moral bank, which would cause the tribe’s moral bank to be reset, which wipes out all credit and debt. This is probably one reason why social animals can build someone up one day and then tear them down the next.
    1. They can kill the A-A.
    2. They can exile the A-A.
    3. The tribe can “social Soul murder” the A-A, which means that they do not kill the A-A’s body, but they 100% destroy/prevent his Soul’s moral credit in the tribe from existing. After this happens, ZERO tribe members want any association with him. Tribe members view the former A-A as if he is “100% horcrux filled evil soul” and if they have any connection to the person, then they will be viewed the same as him.
      1. Best modern example of this is “Trump/Elon/John Douglas/Tommy Robinson” Derangement Syndrome. This is where a person is filled with so much anti-moral hate for someone that they would rather “harm their kids” to prove their hate over “helping their kids.”
        
        “Fuck their kids, IF….” it means “a number above zero (even ½ of 1%)” connection to that person they have a derangement syndrome towards.
  2. moral currency evaluator of the tribe and each member. Actions are weighed by the A-A.
    1. He has to determine if the social animal tribe member is being honest or fake/lying/deceiving.
    2. Then he has to determine the moral weight of that “truth or lie.”
  3. moral network debt/creditor- Not every behavior that a tribe member makes is “life or death” or “pass/fail” which means that a “moral bank account” is needed to weigh the overall moral credit/debt score of a member’s collection of multiple moral choices and behaviors.
    1. Alpha’s have 2 levels of moral credit.
      1. The tribe judges the A-A on a GTO level based on how they morally do for the tribe.
      2. Each alpha has an exploitative moral credit score with each member of the tribe in a personal way.
    2. Tribe members have an exploitative level moral credit account with the alpha that is based on their specific life choices and actions.
Resource Distributer- A-A determines who receives the resources and the amount they receive.

Outside Tribe Territory Moral Responsibilities of A-A

Moral Educator of the moral code that the social animal tribe uses when it deals with life outside their territory and all offense/defense they need to problem solve for the tribe’s survival and thriving potential.
Moral enforcer that makes sure the tribes males are problem solving efficiently moral.
1. Out-Group tribal threats
  1. defensive strategies and training
Moral resource producer- A-A is in charge of making sure that the tribe has enough resources flowing into it, to meet its current and near future needs.
1. Scout information about new territory, prey animals, weather, other tribes, etc.
2. Getting new resources = hunting, gathering, wood, etc.

Why does giving up moral accountability result in a natural emotionalism buzz of happiness?

Explaining Evolutionary Why this Mode is Necessary for Social Animal Survival

2 Moral Accountability modes = Moral weightlifting mode ON and Moral weightlifting mode OFF.

Body and Soul Ego Full Reset- In order to detach from the “hard layer’s moral accountability” for the tribe that is 24/7, social animals needed to develop a mode of existing in the soft center that would allow the individual to “unattach themselves from their hard layer moral accountability” for a time period so that they can rest and recover. A full detachment from the hard layer is needed in order for the individual to have a “healthy soul wash” to keep its emotional regulation in the soul at a healthy level. Sleep is better when detached.
“Neutralize the Lobster Loser Chemicals” - Survival wise, it is better to have an emotionally drug-buzzed person who feels happy over someone who is pissed off and looking to export that “hatred/malice/etc.”
1. Lobster losers have internal loser chemicals that their body ego put in them when they fail to defend a territory or fail to take one over.
  1. Exploitative Strategy for the Individual - The loser chemicals are better to the alternative, which is be killed by the other lobster. Running away means that the loser lobster at least has chance to live and maybe mate elsewhere.
  2. GTO for Lobster Species- Without the loser lobsters body inducing loser chemicals, the lobsters would fight until one or both are dead. This is not good survival species because it would leave all the alpha lobsters too beaten to breed and defend females.
2. Social Animals flip the Lobster Life Strategy and Bring in the Loser Social Animal Males
  1. Lobster loser chemicals work for lobsters, because the loser runs away from the winner’s territory. Social animals bring the loser males into their territory, so it would be very bad if the social animal soul did not have a way to combat and neutralize the loser chemicals that the primal brain puts in the body ego.
    1. The soul’s emotionalism natural high that comes with GIVING UP moral accountability is needed, otherwise the loser males would export their loser chemicals inside the social animal tribe territory by doing terrorism to the women and children.
Emotional Drug High = Lubrication for Transfers of Moral Accountability from A-A to 1st beta male.
1. The A-A is not a loser, but the A-A does need to rest which means giving up their moral accountability temporarily. The A-A is ALWAYS on call, so they need to be ready to go when they wake up, if necessary. In order to get quality sleep and social animal connection to his women and children, the A-A is going to need a mode where the moral accountability of the tribe is pushed to 2ndary mode.
  1. Everyone knows it’s impossible to sleep when your soul and body are in 100% hard layer problem solving moral accountability mode.
    1. Dreams are most likely the subconscious’ way of continuing to try and connect 2 points for problem solving.
Death Distraction
1. Social animal emotional energy is powerful and can overwhelm easily. Social animals needed a way to help non-A-A tribe members from 24/7 worrying about predators and death. The natural emotionalism drug high is a strategy for blocking out the “unpleasant emotions and thoughts” from the non-A-A’s soul-core and consciousness.
  1. Non-A-A members do not have a full ego and moral code naturally on their own, because that is only the A-A and his 1st beta. Non-A-A members have their soul’s core and consciousness filled with the A-A’s ego and moral code. Non-A-A members would have their souls implode and collapse on themselves, if they were trying to continuously hold up moral accountability weight for the tribe.
  2. Social animals need connection outside of themselves and to “something bigger than themselves” aka “natural moral code of an A-A” and “A-A ego handling the moral accountability for them” in hunter gather set up. The A-A’s ego and moral code are what allow the non-A-A individual to “float above their soul’s core” without imploding on self.
    1. 2025 the hunter gather set up is no more for western countries and tribal lines overlap everywhere. It is “peak pretend A-A moral communism” where everyone gives themselves perfect A-A status and credit, even though they never earned it by going through the A-A problem solving ladder. People irrationally believe that they are entitled to an audience and positive reviews, just because they have the right to speak.
Conscious Proactive Problem-Solving Cover
1. DouglasMan’s best problem solving came when he would not move for long periods of time, because the body ego shut down to the minimum necessary energy requirements so that the soul ego can have full use of whatever energy and focus is left to think about complex problems. These long periods of non-movement by DouglasMan are lubricated with the natural emotional high because this acts as a block from outside distraction. The more complex the problem being solved, the more focused and deeper DouglasMan would have to go into his soul cave to calculate. Non-A-A members use the emotionalism drug high to block out moral accountability in the real world, so they can be happy in their soul’s fantasy emotionalism. A-As use the emotionalism drug buzz to block out the real-world distractions, so that they can hyper focus on something specific in the real world, without the distractions from unnecessary things.

Emotionally Sober Reason Based Thinking

List of Social Animal Needs that Require “Emotionally Sober” Moral Judgement

Social Animals brought in all the male mating options into the mating territory, regardless of whether the male is a morally optimal or anti-optimal mating option for the females. This means that females need a way to know who is a “morally optimal male mating option” and who is not. This means that the social tribe’s A-A male needs a way to determine what males he can trust for safety, because the males are sleeping inside his territory and within striking distance when he sleeps. Optimal male lobsters do not allow anti-optimal males to get that close without his warrior internal drive to defend himself goes off.

Who is optimal male and who is anti-optimal male?

Social animals made this question more complicated to answer because it is not as visually clear at a “2 second glance” who is an “optimal male” and who is an anti-optimal male. With lobsters it is clear, because the lobster male is alone, while social animals are a blur of options.

First, it’s important to acknowledge the “body ego” hierarchy will to dominance to prove “body ego” worthiness is still fundamental to all male social animals. Males body egos are still morally judged against physics and every other male body ego in the tribe. With lobsters the biggest body ego is going to win 99% of time because lobsters are all reactionary to the environment. Lobsters do not have the ability to proactive internal life strategize, because they are instinctually reacting to the environment with no internal thought. All social animal males are judged first on the body ego dominance hierarchy of worthiness, and they are either an “A-alpha (optimal) or a B-beta (anti-optimal).”

Social animal males are not judged on their external body ego dominance alone, because even the most physically dominant body egos stand no chance against a mob. Social animals added another “hierarchy of dominance” to their overall evolutionary life strategy which is “social status within the tribe.” High social status level is viewed as an optimal moral mating option, while a low status level male is viewed as an anti-optimal moral mating option. A male is given a status of A-alpha or B-beta on the “social tribe hierarchy of moral social status.”

Social animal men are judged as 4 different basic types:

A-A = Alpha body ego- Alpha social status.
A-B = Alpha body ego- beta social status.
B-A = Beta body ego- Alpha social status.
B-B = Beta body ego- beta social status.

Females desire the best for their kids, because they want them to have as much “Alpha-Alpha social animal moral potential” as possible, because that gives them the best chance to reproduce highly successful. Social animal males do not have to be an “A-A” to reproduce but they better not be viewed as having “B-B” status.

2. Social animals need a “moral currency standard of the tribe”

Social animal males and females need a way to morally judge male’s souls to know who is optimal and who is anti-optimal. Judging female souls is important but not nearly as males, because of the nature of male alpha social species reproduction strategy.

a. Female social animals need to be able to tell the difference between an “optimal moral male and an anti-optimal moral male mating option” when it comes to the individual male’s placement on the “hierarchy of social status dominance.” Females know that they desire the max best genes for their kids to be fathered by, because it gives their kids the best chance to reproduce as well, same as lobsters.

Lobster females only judge the male lobsters by body ego only and that is 100% visual information in public (outside body ego, so all reality that is not the animal itself). Social animal females judge male social animals based on the body ego hierarchy AND their soul’s “hierarchy social status.” Male social animals compete on 2 hierarchy ladders of dominance to demonstrate whether or not they are worthy to be an optimal mating male choice for females, which means that females need 2 moral currencies to judge those males on, one for the body ego and one for the social ego.

Females have the visible information to judge the social animal males body egos in front of them. Plus, social animals are well a tuned to the body ego hierarchy dominance ladder, due to the fact that social animals built on that moral foundation. Now female social animals need a way to morally judge whether a male mating option is “anti-optimal or optimal” when it comes to the moral value of his social animal evolved soul. Evolution need by females to “moral optimally judge what male to breed with.”

b. A-A optimal males and all the rest of the males have an evolutionary need to judge other males and themselves by, because social animal species are forced to live next to both optimal males and anti-optimal males, even when they are in relax mode. Also, a male tribe member maybe optimal for you, but not optimal for another tribe member, so couple different levels to it. Social animal males have 2 “fight or flight” modes. One defensive alarm mode for body ego, which is typically for “outside tribe” realm, but applies inside tribe as well if needed, since soul disputes can turn into body ego disputes quickly. Social animal males also have a defensive alarm mode for their soul’s placement on the tribe’s hierarchy of social dominance. A male that desires to morally reproduce has a moral obligation to himself and “theoretical species moral ideal A-A” to 100% always defend his body ego and soul, because the placement of his 2 egos on those 2 scales determines his moral mating worthiness to the females of that species and tribe.

Lobsters have a mating strategy where only 1 male per territory gets the rights to mate with all the females in his territory. Social animals are not that simple in how they reproduce. The A-A optimal male of the tribe gets the right to attempt reproduction with “all or most” females in his tribe. The A-A is not the only optimal male mating option in the tribe though and no male can become the A-A without having some win-win optimal relationships with at least “some males in the tribe.” No social animal male can do it all alone, he has to have some level of soul optimal moral code and skill to become the top optimal male mating option for females.

Social animal males need a moral code that allows them to know what males in the tribe are optimal FOR THEM and THE TRIBE OVERALL. It is possible for someone to be “for the good of the tribe overall” and be wrong (doesn’t matter the reason), against you, using you, hate you, etc. No animal or individual animal is perfect, now or ever. It is evolutionary necessary to your social animal nature to 100% judge every social animal of your species, especially those who have any authority. Maybe moral. Maybe not moral. Need to understand the boundaries and basic moral math of the game before you can optimally max out your finite life.

All moral males desire to be the A-A so that they can max out their life’s ability to survive, reproduce, and thrive. This means a male needs to know who can help them be the A-A and who stands in the way of them being A-A. Not all males can be A-A, which is why males test each other to find a worthy A-A candidate to attach themselves to. Evolutionally males know that “if you are not the A-A” then you want as optimal a “win-win relationship to the A-A” as possible, because it allows the male to optimize whatever life survival, reproduction, and thriving potential they have, even if their max potential is lower than the A-A they have volitionally attached themselves to.

3. Morally Optimal Evaluation of the tribe’s “in-group moral currency” and “moral code inspection of out-group social animal strangers” objectively requires objective thinking/reasoning ability, due to the fundamental emotional bond and nature of social animals.

Emotions are similar to fog, oil, and “the dark side of the force” in that they make it easy to come to the wrong conclusion about something. They cause many problems in clearly understanding the physics and evolutionary facts of a situation, because they hide information, block information, and even if you do get the correct information, they are going to fight you every step of the way and make it hard to optimally use that information in any moral way.

Consciousness is emotional energy based, so it is nearly impossible for a lot of social animals to fully detach from their emotions. My guess is that only humans and possibly some near-human species have the ability to detach 100% from emotions and think clearly. It is super rare in humans, so I think that it is not likely that any other species was able to fully detach from emotions, probably not even near human species.

If an individual is not able to detach from their soul’s emotions and their body ego’s instincts to think morally clear and emotionally sober, then they are NOT going to be able to optimally and objectively integrate morally with reality, based on the objective knowledge known when the decision was made. Emotionally blacked out and belligerent humans can become more immoral or “anti-optimal morally based” due to emotionally retarded immoral worldviews and mindsets that they become “more evil than a neanderthal could dream.” Emotionally retarded human mindsets can lead to something as anti-moral and delusional as “gender ideology” where social animals have emotionally blinded themselves and tricked their body ego to believe that body ego suicide is great (even though literal impossible) because of the soul social status it can get. It takes a certain level of high IQ species to do something as anti-evolution and immoral as “chemically castrate their youth” because a 1-year old’s babble.

Emotions led social animals down a path to proactive evolutionary based strategic living, by increasing the amount of max potential self-love that an animal has for itself and its baby. Pre-social animals have evolutionary drive to survive, while social animals have evolution’s “drive to survive” and evolution’s “me-love drive to have me-2.0-thrive.” Reactionary subconscious instinct-based living has smaller limits than proactive conscious instinct and emotional love-based living. Increased incentive to live more efficiently and morally with physics reality and other species individual members. Emotions gave social animals more overall individual potential and species potential, but if emotions are anti-morally handled then they also give that social animal species more anti-morality potential than lower evolved species. The only way to optimally deal with emotions is to have an ability to think clearly in an “ so that there is no fog between facts allowing an individual to use reason to connect the moral dots in a straight line of efficiency.

The max moral code that an emotionally drunk mindset can reach is “me-win long term” and “you-lose long term” or “win-lose.” Emotionally drunk people are able to have some “short term win-win” individual relationships with people who are the “same kind of emotional drunk mindset” and “same relative level of emotional drunk mindset” in a general sense. These short-term win-win relationships are never permanent though, since emotions are similar to “waves on the open ocean” or “the ship ride that goes back and forth” at amusement parks. Emotions have the ability to feel 2 opposing feelings and beliefs at the same time, which means that they are not optimally objective long term clear mindsets and can always change with the wind/”emotional impulses.”

Human society and tribes are big enough that in order for an individual male to reach any level of social status that is considered optimal for mating, he has to have some win-win short term relationships, minimum. At the overall Theoretical Human and tribal level though, an emotional based mindset and emotional tribe currency, means that there is always going to be a “you-lose slave class” or throw away class of individuals in the tribe or society. Only a tribal mindset and moral currency that is based on “emotionally sober” individuals making “optimally objective physics and evolution-based win-win” moral decisions can have a full society of individual rights.

Examples of Evolutionary Advantage of an “Emotionally Sober Mindset” for Moral Decision Making

Social Animal GTO and Exploitative Moral Decision-Making Examples

GTO examples = A-A, B-A, and A-B’s moral accountability roles that they serve to the tribes survive and attempts to go beyond mere survival.

Moral Educator
Moral resource producer
Moral enforcer (inside and outside tribes territory)
Tribe’s Moral currency bank owner
- moral currency evaluator
- moral network debt/credit for each tribe member

Exploitative examples of real-life moral decisions that social animals need to make, where it is a huge evolutionary advantage to be able to detach from their emotions to think reasonable with an “emotionally sober mindset.”

proactive strategy that gets some “in-group members” killed but overall good for in-group against whatever tribal threat level problem that they are facing.
An “emotionally sober mindset” is only way to judge “real vs fake emotions”
- moral currency evaluator/judge of in-group needs to be able to know real from fake emotions, if they are to optimally move the tribe in the evolutionary win-win moral direction
- Every Social Animal Individual = “Individual protection” and “individual life flourishing” is why every member of the social animal tribe has an evolutionary advantage to have the ability to objectively judge other members in their tribe and any stranger they may meet. “Emotionally drunk mindsets” are always looking for win-lose relationships with other members of their tribe/society, both in the short and long term. The only way for an individual to give themselves the best moral potential for themselves and those individuals that they value, is for them to optimally max out their ability to judge other individuals with an “emotionally sober mindset” that is clear thinking and reason based.
Real life or emotional projection from the Soul = Individuals have a need to tell the difference between a “memory/future worry/dream” and real life, because a fantasy-based individual can do any anti-moral thing they believe. Only conscious animals have this issue of not knowing if something is “physics-based reality real” or “social animal soul’s emotional projection to the body-ego.” An individual that cannot tell the difference between fantasy and reality, is an individual that is emotionally drunk, win-lose, and has a chance of being a huge anti-moral threat, at any given time due to the emotionally anti-reality unstable cloud they live they life on.

“1 Life Experience to Learn From” vs “NEAR-Infinite Life’s to Learn from” Potentially = The ability to think about a memory and learn a lesson without being emotionally engaged by the thought experiment, has massive evolutionary advantages. The ability to learn from a story means that you can learn from stories that you did not take part in or witness. This is how proactive social animal species can project all their information onto the next generation to build on and correct any mistakes. Non-social animals can only learn 1st hand, whereas social animal humans, for example, have near infinite possibilities. Humans can learn from every other human in history that has or had the ability to extract their soul’s conclusions and preserve those conclusions onto some physics-based material.