Evolution’s Effect’s on Theoretical Human’s A-A Potential
Part 1: Physics-Ego Facts
Dear Theoretical Human, DouglasMan’s not racist.
That is all the amount of effort I’m going to put in to convincing you. People who know me in real life know that I am not. I know I am not. DouglasMan doesn’t care what irrational people believe about him. Plus, a real white supremacist would not accept facts that say that white people are only best at swimming, on average.
Racism is irrational and immoral regardless of who it is targeted at. Black supremacists are as immoral as white supremacists. Individual rights for all people, regardless of race, is the only moral path forward. DouglasMan would not dedicate his life to Optimizing Theoretical Human, if he did not genuinely 100% primary care about optimal morality and being as optimally of a moral monster as DouglasMan possibly can be, if there was any irrational maliciousness in him.
Judge DouglasMan however you want, you’re going to no matter what he says. He used to care about what others had to say about him, but then DouglasMan realized that was irrational. The only thing he should care about is making sure that my world views are fact based. The more facts that you stand on, the better your chance is to be moral. Correct morality is only possible when its foundation is based on facts and reason. DouglasMan do not care about your judgement. DouglasMan only cares about facts.
There are two issues that DouglasMan gets called a racist on, when he accurately describes TRANS-prophet muhammed’s immoral and delusional ideology, and when DouglasMan points out the fact that evolution has had an effect on humans. Just because he is called a racist, that does not actually mean that he is. It’s similar to the fact that leftist call anyone who doesn’t agree with them a “nazis.” Irrational people who judge me irrationally do not speak for me.
Democrats and muslims are LITERAL SYSTEMIC RACIST and PEDOPHILES. They have ZERO right to call anyone racist or a pedophile with any kind of moral high ground. Marx and muhammed is the “lowest of all creation.”
Body-Ego Differences are NOT a Soul-Ego Moral Judgement
DouglasMan wants to make it clear that hes saying differences, I am not saying any group is superior or inferior. It is true that each group has different group averages when it comes to different human traits, so you could say that one group is” better or worse at one particular human trait on average” but that does not mean overall a human is inferior or superior nor does it tell you anything about any specific individual.
The only judgement that matters overall in determining whether a human being is inferior or superior, is that human beings overall moral value system. A person who values “individual rights and personal freedom” is morally superior to a human being who “believes slavery is good” regardless of race.
DNA and Environment Both Play Role
Evolution is real and has had an effect on all humans. Evolution does not determine whether or not a person reaches their potential though, for any given human trait. It is safe to say that all human traits are a combination of genes and environmental factors. We do not know the exact percentages of each human trait, in terms of “how much is it genes?” vs “how much of it is environment?” It is safe to say that all human traits are a combination of both genes and environment, genes play a role somewhere between 1%-99% and environmental factors play a role somewhere between 1%-99%. There is no human trait that is all genes or all environmental factors.
For example, a person’s potential for height is determined by your genes, but whether or not you reach that potential is largely determined by environmental factors. Look at North Korea for example, the population there is shrinking because they do not have enough food and energy to put into their body. A person’s IQ potential is set by their genes, but a lot of environmental factors go into making sure that person reaches their full potential. A person’s IQ is influenced by the educational options they have, the amount of food and nutrients they get, whether or not they have a brain injury, etc.
Why Look at Topic?
DouglasMan got interested in this issue because DouglasMan was sick and tired of black supremacist calling everything “white supremacy” and blaming “all black people’s issues” on white people. Everything is racism to them; math, coffee, individuality, waking up early, being on time, and they even want to blame black crime on white people. DouglasMan was sick and tired of the lies and hateful racism being spread by these black supremacists, so he decided to study the issue as a whole.
These black supremacists were claiming that white supremacy is responsible for black people not doing as well in academia, the economy, and for black people committing the most crime on average. These black supremacists are not going to like the answer for why black people do not perform as well in the economy, academia, and why they commit more crime on average. The answer is not systemic racism, the answer is evolution did not distribute all human traits evenly between all ethnic groups.
People seem to have no problem accepting evolution and human differences when it comes to areas of life that black people excel at, but then contradict themselves when it is areas that black people do not dominate, why is that? Why do people allow black people to have special social rules vs non-black people? Black people dominate the NBA and people celebrate it as meritocracy. Asian people dominate the SATS, and people call it white supremacy, even though Asians are not white. Why is society ok with people literally pushing for systems of black supremacy, such as DEI and affirmative action (LITERAL SYSTEMIC RACISM AND MALCIOUS HATEFUL BIGOTRY), but if those ideas were pushed for Asians or whites, then those same people would suddenly have a problem with it? Why do so many people in society believe that racism and white people are bad?
Insecurity, greed, jealousy, etc.
A few years ago, at the NFL combine, Deion Sanders got excited because a white dude was “fast fast” as he referred to it and he was shocked, and no one had a problem with his evaluation of a white person being super athletic, but if an Asian was shocked by a really great mathematician being black (“O, you smart smart”) then it would be considered racism
Not Racism, Just Evolution
If you don’t accept evolution, then this HumanVerse DickHeadtionary is not for you. You might as well return to whatever delusional fantasy you live in. This article would just cause you pain and cognitive dissonance, similar to when a man in a dress gets called a “he.”
Evolution is small changes over time. It would be anti-evolution to think that groups separated by 50,000+ years would stay the same. It is possible for groups after 50,000 years to have the same averages, but the probability of that is practically zero. The reality is that every single human trait is most likely going to be slightly different between the 3 groups of people: blacks, whites, and Asians. All three groups are still human and can mate with one another. All three groups have slight differences though.
Now remember that these are just the averages, so there are outliners, and you can’t judge individuals by a group average, because almost no one is an exact match of the group’s averages. All specific individuals are their own being and will not be all averages of a group, but that does not change the fact that evolution is real, and group averages do exist.
Most body-ego dominant (athletically and testosterone) =
-
Africans
-
Europeans
-
Asians
Highest IQ =
-
Asians have 106 average
-
Europeans have 100 average
-
Africans have 85 average
On average though, blacks are most athletic and excel in physical based challenges, whites are 2nd, and Asians are 3rd. On average, Asians have the highest IQ, whites are 2nd, and blacks are 3rd. On average, blacks have biggest penis, whites are 2nd, and Asians are 3rd. The only human trait that I found whites to be 1st in was swimming, because although blacks are more athletic, their skeleton structure is heavier, which means they sink into water more and have to deal with more water resistance. Water resistance is far more difficult to deal with than wind resistance.
There are tons of data on these issues, so please do not take my word for it, just look up the data yourself.
Physics-Ego Real Facts and Data
When you look at statistics and data from reality, it matches up with what evolution tells us. Just look at the data in sports; sprinting, basketball, football’s skill positions (running back, wide receiver, cornerback, safety), other track and field sports, etc. Does the NFL and NBA really have a systemic black supremacy system in place, or does it make more sense that evolution is responsible for the differences? Are black people really holding Asians back from being wide receivers? When a certain race has the “highest percent chance of being born with most athletic potential” then there is a “higher percent of individuals in that race” with the POTENTIAL to make it in a career that is “largely based on being optimally athletic.” Super Standard and straight forward statistically speaking in understanding how slight differences can have large impacts, especially at the extreme ends. Every little percent difference has a real “cause and effect” influence on Theoretical Human. It is obviously up to the specific individuals to make the most of their potential, whatever level that is.
Let’s compare Asians and whites when it comes to academia, crime, and economic earnings. Asians do better in academia and earn more in the economy. Asian women outearn white men in the economy, because a higher IQ allows people to tackle more challenging cognitive tasks, which often earn individuals more monetary compensation. If Harvard only accepted people based on their resume without including race, then Asians would make up over half the enrollment, because having a higher on average IQ helps people do better in an academic setting. Asians commit less crime on average than white people. It makes sense that a higher average IQ would help individuals understand the concepts of morality, crime, cause and effect, and have the ability to reason through the common emotions that often lead people to commit crime. On average, a person with a high IQ is more likely to earn more money, do well in academia, and commit less crime, than a person with a lower IQ.
Asians prove that it’s not a white supremacist system, because they outperform whites in academia, the economy, and they commit less crime. If there really was a white supremacist system, then whites would dominate blacks and Asians, but that is obviously not the case. Blacks dominate sports and Asians dominate in the economy and academia.