top of page

A-A’s Moral Job to Be an Emotional Dialysis Machine for Tribe Members Soul-Ego

 

Short-Term Human Nature

It is important to mention that part of people’s problem with processing emotions, is due to the fact that evolved tribal nature only allows the top 2 males to have a complete ego. Social animal nature is set up this way to maximize the tribe’s efficiency through the jungle. The 1st evolved human environment was a true warzone of survival for 100,000+ years. If everyone had an ego in the human tribe, then there would be far too much fighting for dominance between the men and the tribe would try to move in multiple directions at the same time. This is why the fight for dominance is “my ego controls the tribe’s future vision and current moral code.” If human nature was “die or alpha leader” then humans would not have survived because that moral code would decimate all the males and leave tribe too vulnerable.

 

Moral Math of Short-Term Social Animal Human Nature

vs.

Win-Win Optimal Long-Term Morality for Theoretical Human

 

Emotionalism Addict Mindset

  1. A person is presented with an objective fact about reality and the primal brain refuses to process the emotion tied to that fact.

  2. Alarm bells go off and the person chooses to evade, project buzzwords, and hide with some fantasy immorality story.

 

You can metaphorically think of the Soul-Ego as “a person in an empty room processing emotions.” They are survival short term based on emotionalism addicts. They deal with positive emotions and negative emotions. They like positive emotions. They don’t like negative emotions. All emotions are positive or negative. Positive and negative emotions are on a spectrum and not everyone can process the most negative extreme emotions. A lot of people cannot process emotions at the extreme positive end either.

 

This is why human morality is determined by A-A individuals only, because only A-A’s have the ability and desire to take responsibility for the tribe’s optimal life strategy long-term. This means that an optimal moral human society “100% depends on the top 1-10% of A-As” to take on the responsibility. This means that that system has to do continuous moral maintenance on everyone, but especially B-B’s, because they have small moral “fuel tanks.” They 100% rely on the A-A’s and the other leaders Soul-egos to help them refill their moral gas tank. A-A’s have to consider any major emotionally producing society event, for example “an earthquake, major influential individual dies, etc.”

 

The fact that 95% of humans do not naturally have a 100% complete ego and moral code of that ego, is probably the primary reason that humans had to invert their moral code from “real physics-ego based” to “fantasy-based god/hero concepts” before humans were able to build bigger human societies. Societies cannot form without a moral code that is in line with physics-ego and evolution enough, for that to happen. Think of it like a “Goldie locks zone for survival potential” and all societal moral codes that do not fall in the “Goldie locks survive zone” never get remembered due to inability to further human societal moral life. All moral codes that cause society to go against reality will eventually destroy themselves.

 

A large amount of the A-A’s time and energy is dedicated to helping the individual tribe members, and the tribe “as a whole” to process the “24/7 emotional bombardment” that human nature objectively is and always will be. Every single A-A in human history AFTER the fantasy morality invert happened has had to choose some “fantasy” in their strategy, because not enough objective facts till now, to do true 100% win-win moral life strategy for both the individual and the tribe.

 

The body-ego’s primal brain produces an emotional response to a stimulus in objective reality and metaphorically “inside the Soul-Ego” an emotion paper appears on the person desk and needs to be processed. The person desires to instantly process it so that it’s 100% ready for whatever life throws next. Animal nature is designed to always try to have your max moral potential ready 24/7.

 

Maybe, the person desires to hold onto the emotions a little longer, for whatever reason. Or an emotion is too overwhelming, or scary, and soon the room/Soul-Ego begins to fill and become “emotionally constipated.” If the Soul-Ego is not optimal in its emotional processing, then it will result in “mental illness” and/or Body-ego illnesses. A person cannot be optimally moral if they cannot connect to their frontal lobe. The primal brain and frontal lobe connection depends on the moral principled mindset of the individual which 100% has to factor in emotional processing life strategy.

 

That person in the empty room processing the “emotional papers” varies in ability and moral responsibility fiber and life experiences. They could be A-A or B-B, low or high IQ, etc., it varies from person to person. The main point is that humans need a moral principled emotional processing strategy otherwise morality is not possible, because the primal brain will be too overwhelmed and cannot connect to the frontal lobe. An optimal moral society needs to have a moral decentralized network to help maintain an optimal emotional processing system for each individual’s Soul-Ego’s “emotional paper pusher person.” Ideally, the emotional processing system is customizable by each individual, since no two humans experience are exactly the same.

 

Every Family Needs an A-A Emotional Dialysis Machine

 

An optimal moral society needs every family unit to have an A-A morality hotspot 24/7 functioning consciously and is always on call. Men are more suited for it on average, but an optimal moral society would not mandate that. A moral society allows its individuals to volition their own choices about private matters and as long as no individual rights are violated then it is private matter to solve the problem.

 

Realistically, not every family unit is going to have a “real A-A” and that is why A-A’s need an optimal moral community network to make sure that society is always processing emotions and always filling up its member’s moral gas tank.

Ideally a societal moral code is optimal for that moment in human history so that it leads humans to the ability to discover a more “morally correct” moral code for the society to upgrade too next.

 

The “God/Hero concept” is super necessary for an optimal society because:

  1. The hero concept helps the individual’s Imaginationland run efficient by human nature standards of “revolving around the A-A tribe leader.”

  2. The hero concept helps the individual to efficiently process its emotions.

  3. The hero concept acts like an additional “moral gas station” that the individual has with them always.

  4. The hero concept is 100% needed for every human to be able to confront life’s problems and conflicts optimally, even for A-A’s. A-As would confront problems and conflicts regardless, but the hero concept optimally helps them use their max moral potential.

    1. 100% vouch for this personally, because after I had a still imagine in my head of “Vettuce’s Fire Island Room” then my processing of the “win-lose” slavers gaslighting went up at least a factor of 10x. Haters were “just more logs for Vettuce’s fire that fuels me.”

      1. Vettuce was 100% essential in helping DouglasMan process his Theoretical Human moral accountability weight load.

  5. The hero concept is needed to guide kids and give them courage to confront problems. All kids are betas to some degree, so they need a concept and tool to optimize their ability to; find the courage, honesty, emotional control to use reason to be moral, so that they can grow up to be an A-A, A-B, or B-A.

  6. For B-B’s the hero concept is needed to increase their ability to “stay within acceptable moral bumper lanes.”

    1. B-Bs are low skill and/or they consciously reject responsibility for defining or enforcing morality.

    2. They have zero care about long term morality.

    3. They are stuck in primal brain short term survival mode. They accept whatever moral terms the A-A sets and then they live in a way that they believe they can “get away with, without too harsh a punishment.”

    4.  At least the B-B’s that have that much IQ ability.

  7. Women are B-A’s and B-B’s due to their reproductive nature.

    1. Women have ability to be tribal leader, if survival need rises to that.

      1. They will get burnt out long-term doing it though, because they do not have a natural desire to be moral accountability weight barer for themselves, let alone for the whole tribe.

        1. Women do not want to be on tribe’s “problem solving call” 24/7.

        2. They do not want to be emotionlessly using the frontal lobe the majority of the time.

        3. They are naturally submissive.

          1. A-A has to confront all problems the tribe faces, both violent and non-violent problems.

          2. A-A cannot worry about how the tribe and its members view them, because they have to make the best win-win decision for the tribe overall.

            1. Women have a high desire to be socially accepted, and it prevents them from being able to make the hard moral decision that is best for Theoretical Human, a large amount of the time.

          3. Women have a more average temperament and a desire to be around those with an average temperament. The A-A has to deal with whatever the problem is, no matter how extreme.

 

Woman’s Nature is to Reject Moral Accountability

 

Women having the nature they have does not mean they are inferior because humans survived the jungle. They are ½ the human species equation and humans won the “survive the jungle game” so they deserve half the credit when it comes to GTO Theoretical Human’s natural social animal nature. Human society is a jawbreaker for a reason, and a jawbreaker is not a jawbreaker without the soft center or the hard layer, BOTH NEEDED 100%.

 

Women need help confronting emotional constipation due to the fact that a woman naturally have a submissive and partial ego. Women are naturally not going to have a full ego, because 1st evolved human tribe is never going to be volitionally led by a pregnant woman. Women have 2 egos that matter, same as men, the body-ego and the soul-ego. Evolutionarily speaking, “lobster body-ego” level and the “social animal soul-ego” level, females avoid moral accountability and leave it to the “A-Body-Ego” male and the “A-A-Soul-Ego” male. At lobster level, the Alpha lobster body-ego establishes an optimal mating male territory and then takes 100% of the moral accountability for keeping anti-optimal male lobsters away from the females. At the social animal level, the A-A male controls the mating territory of the tribe and assumes 100% moral accountability for everything inside the territory and all problems the tribe faces outside the territory. Female social animals leave moral enforcement and policing up to the A-A and A-B. It is the A-A and A-B job to make sure that anti-optimal males stay away from the females. Any negative emotions the females deal with get projected onto the anti-optimal males.

 

The alpha man is primarily physics-ego value-based and focused on problem solving, regardless of emotional discomfort. Women are social-emotional based and have a desire to allow others to emotionally vent their emotions as a PRIMARY value. This is due to the social animal female nature of trying to prevent intertribal violence. The less complete an individual’s ego (man/woman) is, the less their ability and ambition is to process their own emotional constipation. The “less soul-ego” an individual has, the “less drive to be moral principled with self and others” that individual is. An individual with “little or no soul-ego” has a higher “foundational basic mindless animal desire” to choose “feel good emotions” over confronting any “negative emotion inducing” thoughts.

Cognitive Dissonance

 

Social animals that fundamentally do not view themselves in a positive way will not fight for their life, and the odds of them passing on genes are low to none. Humans have a fundamental need to feel positive about themselves. Humans have a fundamental need to know that good and bad exist, because if good and bad did not exist then social animals would not have survived. Reality is not a participation trophy award game where all behaviors have the same outcome. Reality is physics based, and the best strategies are going to survive, because physics-ego moral code tax is 24/7. Surviving and thriving for social animals, which human nature is objectively designed to do, means that humans need to integrate the 3 egos that control human life: physics-ego, evolution body-ego, and evolution’s soul-ego.

 

Cognitive dissonance behavior is what the internal conscious soul-ego will use to; avoid, run away from, attack the messenger’s credit, etc., in an attempt to maintain “moral superiority” in whatever faith or beliefs that they have, which is clearly wrong based on the facts of reality that they are being presented with. This individual does not want to experience the negative feelings that would be felt by them, if the facts that they are being presented with are indeed real facts. Humans have a fundamental need to view themselves as morally superior to others, even if they cannot explain it in any real and factual-based way. Vast majority of humans associate “morals” with “positive emotions” and all humans have a fundamental objective need to view themselves in a positive emotional way. An emotionalist addict will choose “good feelings” over “hard to accept real facts of reality” exactly the same as an alcoholic who is addicted to “feel good buzz.”

 

If an individual is not willing to accept reality facts “as reality facts are” then the individual will turn to an immorally malicious and dishonest list of behaviors that are designed to “preserve the appearance of themselves being correct” in the public’s perception and their own head. This means that any facts or people, who know and use those “facts which demonstrate their current mindset and worldview is anti-moral and anti-reality” will receive; verbal gaslighting and propaganda terrorism against their Soul-Ego and/or their body-ego will receive violence terrorism.

 

Emotionally blackout and belligerent individuals are “as delusional or more delusional” than a blacked-out alcoholic, because alcohol really shuts down the human brains ability to plan long term. An emotionally blackout person can plan evil long-term and carry it out, far more effectively than a blacked out drunk person. They are more dangerous due to another fact as well, which is that being “blacked out emotionally” is far easier to hide than being “blacked out alcoholically.” An emotionally blacked out person can manipulate other people far more effectively than a blacked out alcoholic person.

 

Cognitive dissonance is similar to being “emotionally constipated.” The individual has a large number of internal emotions tied to “memories of past decisions” and “future problems they are facing.” In order for an individual to process emotions they need to have a moral code of some kind. Not all moral codes are the same. The higher the quality of the moral code that is used to confront and process emotions, the more long-term moral it is for the individual. “Higher quality of moral code” means “higher integration efficiency” of 3 moral egos humans have. Knowing the knowledge needed to have a high-quality moral processing code is not enough, because the individual still has to honestly confront their internal emotional constipation and reasonably deal with everything there is to deal with.

 

Most people choose to become soul-ego or body-ego terrorist, because they are not able to honestly and reasonably confront their internal emotional constipation. In life there are a lot of choices that allow people to make the short-term emotional “win now-lose later” option or the “long term honest and reasonably moral choice” of “win now-win later.” The reason that most people choose the short-term answer, is likely due to the fact that they either lack the body-ego ability or they are “emotionalism addicts” so addicted to feeling good that they would rather “project terrorism/do terrorism” rather than honestly face any immorality that they have done, are doing, or plan to do. The long-term honest and reasonable moral choice means that the individual must process all negative emotions that they have, which they are the cause of, so that they can bravely face immorality, learn, understand, and then do the long term 24/7 hard work of maintaining a life path that is long term moral win-win.

symbol.jpg

©2025 Theoretical Human's HumanVerse. Powered by Gozoek

bottom of page