Theoretical Human’s History of Colonizat

Theoretical Human’s History of Colonization/Slavery/Conquering

ZERO Indigenous People in 10,000 Years

Anti-European Colonization Humans = Dishonest and Anti-Moral Weak, Pathetic “Sneaky Betas” Racist Scum

Colonization/Conquering = Same FUCKING THING FUCTIONALLY

ALL humans have a long history of colonization. It's 100% evil to try and demonize the ONLY culture that has a long history of trying to create a society that values INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. M3 sick and tired of people using the term indigenous. People who use this word are either malicious, ignorant or evil. There are no indigenous people anywhere on main land continents on Earth. The only places that might be actual descendants of the indigenous tribe that were the first humans to that piece of land, are small islands that are far away from other pieces of land. The first humans to those islands would have a big advantage over other humans who came. No where though on the mainland continents are there actual indigenous people.

People who use the word “indigenous” = 100% white hating racist scum

Foundation of Anti-European Racism = Emotional-Holic Anti-Moral Losers Mentality

Examples of Anti-Moral and Dishonest Views People Emotionalize to “Emotionally justify to themselves their racist hate for white people”

The number of people killed does not equal morality in anyway. The number of people is scale of morality, not morality itself. Morality are the principles and actions that were taken that lead to violence.
- A moral monster kills EVERY evil human who tries to rape and murder his daughter. There is no number of evil scums that wants to murder and rape M3’s daughter that M3 would not proudly kill with a smile. The smile is knowing there is one less evil “horocrux filled human Soul-Ego” that threatens M3 daughter and Theoretical Human. M3 not care if M3 need to kill 1 or 10 billion evil humans to protect M3 daughter. The number of people M3 need to kill does not stop M3’s moral actions from being the highest quality.
Anti-White racist scum has to be so dishonest in their emotionalization of history that they effectively become pathetic losers who hate Christopher Columbus because he took a boat to America, rather than calling a travel agent to “book a window seat on an airplane instead.”
People try and claim that European colonization was worse because it put up bigger numbers and gave more “L’s.” That is as full retardation as believing that the winner of the college basketball march madness tournament is the evilest, because it gave the “most L’s.” Everyone should “hate the Superbowl winner the mostest” level of emotional-holic as possible.
Why when people talk about Europeans conquering Africa, do they not talk about how they ended the slave trade? How many African countries had abolished slavery in 1866? If Europeans never bought African slaves or conquered it, then that Africa slave trade would 99.9999% still being going on. MAJORITY of Africans LOVE slavery.

Why Europeans have Dominated Up to This Point in Theoretical Human History

The bottom line is that Europeans were more successful because their “in-group” moral principles, metaphors and concepts “embraced science and individual rights to a higher degree” than ALL OTHER societies did. Better moral code allows individual humans to more efficiently work in win-win relationships where true production and moral advancement for Theoretical Human is possible. Technology, knowledge, learning how to control yourself, and thinking clearly are all super hard things for social animals to do. It takes time, energy, and effort. Tribes going back and forth to conquer and learn from each other were always going to happen. Physics-Ego is real and humans are finite. Humans can only make moral choices based on the moral options they have. Humans can only build moral options that are possible to build and create, based on the knowledge and moral options of that time.

It’s not accurate to judge Europeans on how they treated the "out groups" aka native Americans and Africans, without judging them compared to every other tribe or group in the world at that time, and then evaluating how each one of those tribes treated their "out groups." Judging a race of people by a completely different standard than you judge all other races, IS MALICIOUSLY EVIL RACISM. It is 100% ANTI-MORAL to believe that an individual or a group of people should treat their “out-group” better or equal to their “in-group.”

The only anti-colonization morality is a society based on full individual rights. There is no country today or ever that has had the ideal political set up based on full individual rights (practically speaking). The American founders did have that idea, but their implementation was off. Whether people like it or not, the antidote to colonization was invented largely by humans from European descent. This does not mean that all people of that race get credit. It only means that the individuals who led to Theoretical Human having individual rights get credit. Certain societies who implemented those ideas also get credit, but only those specific societies and individuals in those societies. Credit is not given to people for things they did not personally do. You only get credit for things you have personally done.

Ignorance leads to irrationality. Irrationality always leads to immorality. The only path to correct morality is facts and reason. There are no indigenous people on the mainland continents anywhere. Stop letting evil people emotionally manipulate you, your family, or your community. Individual Rights based societies are going to have more moral production in survival goods, knowledge, technology, thriving needs, storytelling, and overall, more efficient win-win human relationships and societies, just compare “north vs south” in America between 1776 – 1861. Europeans dominated, because European MORAL VALUES and PRINCIPLES are MORE OPTIMAL than everyone else’s.

Reality and history “is what it is.” You can be a fucking hateful racist scumbag, whose 100% immoral, delusional, and COMPLETELY UNGRATEFUL for the world they were privileged to join, if they were African or Native American. “White privilege” is a white-hating RACIST dishonest word, designed to do a “summer races” favorite thing- steal. European descendants are not privledged, because their ancestors LITERALLY PAID IT FORWARD FOR THEM.

WHITE HATE = PATHETIC LOSER RACIST SCUMBAG FAGGGGGOOOOTTTT

Palestine is one of the Least Indigenous Places in Theoretical Human History

People need to stop watching the movie Tropic Thunder so much, because Simple Jack is not the hero everyone is supposed to be like.

All mainland land has been conquered and reconquered many many times, but the 2 pieces of land that have been conquered and reconquered the most is the piece of land just inside Africa that leads to the middle east and the piece of land just outside Africa in the middle east. All of humanity passed through those two pieces of land. Palestine has not known indigenous people in over 50,000 years.

2 points about Israel

If people are going to claim though that the longer a tribe’s history in an area is, the more claim they have to it, then the Jews and Israel have far more of a right to that land by couple thousand years on trans-prophet Muhammeds invented racist pedophile terrorist death cult. LITERALLY.
Israel is literally the only country in the middle east that cares about individual rights. It’s not perfect but all Israel citizens have the same rights, even trans-prophet Muhammeds worshippers. There is no other country in the middle east that cares about individual rights.

Native Americans

The native Americans were the first full humans to come to north America, but there’s a good chance that there was other “near human” species in North America, similar to Neanderthal being in Europe. Native Americans most likely took them out and breed them out, similar to whites in Europe. The native Americans on the east coast of North America when the Europeans came were not indigenous, AT ALL. They were not the first humans to that piece of land. There were other tribes before them who got conquered. Those pieces of land probably traded hands hundreds of times over the previous 10,000 years. Native Americans were just as much colonizers as the Europeans were. They were not morally superior at all. Its fucking retardedly delusional to judge Europeans on how they treated the native Americans, without judging the Native Americans based on the same standard. How did the Native Americans treat those that they considered to be their “out group?”

My history of Europeans coming over to America is not perfect, but didn’t the native Americans that Columbus first encountered asked for his help in ENSLAVING THEIR “out-group” rivals? Why should Columbus treat the Native Americans BETTER than Native Americans treated themselves? It is anti-moral and anti-human nature to expect someone to enslave themselves to other people. Those kind of “anti-evolutionary animal nature” retards do not survive.

Native Americans had scalping, which is taking pride in having a new “notch on your belt” but it’s for killing. Native Americans did human sacrifice by the thousands. Native Americans had slavery. Native Americans would conquer, murder and rape, just as much as every other group of humans. Native Americans were not united in any real way, which is why they asked for the Europeans help in conquering the native America tribes they hated.

Native Americans did not have any concept of private property or individual rights. Without property rights, you cannot have individual rights. Native Americans didn’t have any concept of modern science. Do you really think that it is more moral to build a society where women die in childbirth at “more than 25%” or a society where “less than 5%” of women die in childbirth?

M3 #1 incentive to be the best M3 that M3 can be, is M3’s future wife and daughter “singing and dancing without a care in the world” inside an optimally moral “soft center” of safety and joy. M3 100% understand how valuable knowledge and technology are to Theoretical Human achieving an optimal moral society for all individual humans, now till M3-Infinity.

African Colonization

Africans were enslaving their "in group" so you know they did not give a fuck about their "out groups" because you always treat the “out group” worse than the “in group.” Zero sympathy for Africans who complain about colonization. Africans are not morally superior to the European colonizers in any way at all. All African tribes were trying to conquer and colonize each other just as hard. Rwanda genocide is a perfect example of Africans being racists to Hitler level towards other Africans. African tribes have been trying to genocide each other since humans evolved.

To my knowledge, M3 not aware of any Africa philosopher that independently came up with the concept of individual rights. To my best knowledge individual rights came from ancient Greece and then spread throughout the world from there. Please give me facts if M3 is wrong. So, if Africa had no concept of individual rights, then that means that ALL AFRICAN societies were SLAVE based at that time. At least the societies that had enough technology for slavery, because hunter gatherers don’t have technology for slavery.

Before the Atlantic slave trade and European colonization, Africans were taking slaves from Europe for over 600+ years. It is weird that most Africans either don’t know about this or ignore it. More Europeans were enslaved and for a longer time period by Africans, than the North American Atlantic slave trade which reversed the roles. If “slavery-built America” then why isn’t North Africa popping with technology and 1st world level rights? Where are white people’s reparations?

Africans were ENSLAVING Europeans BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER, the Atlantic Slave trade. Fuck off with your racist hate against Europeans for conquering your ancestors

(1801-1844) Black supremacist love pointing out that Haiti was one of the first countries to outlaw slavery, but that is usually when they distract the conversation away from Haiti. Haiti won independence and then immediately invaded and colonized their neighbor Dominican Republic. It took the Africans, who are now Haitians, three times to successfully colonize their neighbor, but thanks to their “Theoretical Human nature to maximize their surviving and thriving abilities” and persistence, they colonized their neighbor. Hmmmmmmm 🤔

It’s impossible for EMOTIONALLY based animals to go from “complete out-group slavery” to suddenly making the “out-group” totally equal to the “in-group.”

Segregation was evil by today’s standards, but its irrational to judge humans in a way that is not possible based on their nature and standard of the time. Humans have a primal brain of instinct and emotion. If the primal brain is overwhelmed and unable to connect to frontal lobe consciousness to use reason., then the primal brain acts with short-term win-lose mindset. Ending slavery and bringing in an "out group" for the first time in history is a very high instinct-based moment in human history. It is impossible to rush it. The fact that it was race based and so obvious who is “in group” and who is “former out group” made the integration even harder, because everyone always knew who was in which group, so its high alert 24/7 on both sides.

It would be like trying to have “the bloods” and “the crips” suddenly integrate and live in the same neighborhood. It makes sense for humans to need to go through a period of bringing in the "former out group" in a slow way. Are you going to go from seeing someone as an “out group” member to immediately accepting them into your life in completely intimate ways? You suddenly trust them with your kids next door, or do you want a period of caution?

Caution is a very reason-based instinct that humans have because it protects us from being harmed by others. It’s easy to look back and judge people in 1865 based on the knowledge we have now. They didn’t have our knowledge though. They only had 1865 knowledge. It’s COMPLETELY RETARDEDLY DELUSIONAL, completely anti-moral and maliciously dishonest and irrational to judge people based on knowledge, evidence, and technology that they did not have at the time that they made the choice that you are delusionally judging.

If you are going to judge Europeans in 1865-1968, then you need to honestly judge them by the SAME FUCKING STANDARDS that you judge African societies during that SAME TIME PERIOD. The African kings wanted to go to war with Europeans to keep their slaves, after Europeans decided to end the slave trade. How are the slaving African kings any different than the confederate south in America? Why are they not continuously condemned by black supremacists in America? These are the ones responsible for the capture and sale of the African slaves to the Europeans.

Africa still has tons of slavery in 2025.

Anti-White racism May force a 30,000+ year “Jurassic Park reset” for Theoretical Human

For the past few decades Europe has allowed millions of pedophile terrorists (Muslims) into their continent illegally and it has led to massive amounts of evil actions against Europeans and their kids. Trans-prophet Muhammeds death cult has literally been trying to conquer and enslave Europe since he invented it 1400+ years ago. The crusades were SELD-DEFENSE and 100% morally correct to happen overall. Muhammeds’s terrorist death cult was continuously terrorizing Europeans, murdering, taking slaves, rape, etc. Europe had to defend itself. There were only a few crusades but there were more than 500 terrorism crusades/attacks by trans-prophet Muhammeds invented death cult. They are 100% against gambling, music, dancing, love, fashion, free will, volitional living, etc. They have always destroyed every non-islam culture they can.

Islam is 100% evil. It’s a single human slavery system to a lying pedophile terrorist. He was 100% racist. His death cult started the African slave trade. They castrated ALL blacks because they did not want black blood in middle east. About 40% of Africans died in the castration process, which seems like a completely wasteful and inefficient way to use a slave, but trans-prophet Muhammeds racist death cult is so maliciously hateful and racist that it would rather have 40% of slaves die before even being used, than risk NON-arab blood” in the middle east. PURE HATEFUL AND MALICIOUSLY EVIL.

Europe is so full of maliciously self-hatred after gaslighting propaganda by Marxist for decades, that Europe actually believes that ONLY WHITES can be evil. They believe that people who are not white “can’t be evil” which is just an incredibly hatefully racist thing to say. Europe is emotionally blacked out and belligerent. Europe and many whites in Americas are so full of “winners guilt” for their ancestry developing the optimal moral code for the human species and due to this massive moral edge, it allowed “generational Theoretical Human compounding morality” to build up objective knowledge, science, technology, etc.

“Winners Guilt” is largely what this white hate and guilt is from. It comes from white women the most because Europeans were the ones to develop the optimal moral concepts for humans. Women are participation award trophy winners natured, so standing out for women is a death sentence because “the hens will cluck her up.” Standing out for women is very anti-woman fundamental nature, which is why they always try to add themselves to a group in some way when taking credit “for protection in numbers” and proving that their “individual ego” is not above the “collective women’s ego.”

White hate + feminism = suicide of white straight men from RACIST, SEXIST and MALICIOUSLY HATEFUL white women

Feminist white women 100% believing men and women are same, is why so many DELUSIONALLY and IMMORALLY BELIEVE it 100%. These racist evil cunts believe all white men should hate themselves. Any white straight man who doesn’t “hate himself” needs to get “clucked up by femTarded white women” in their racist, sexist, and self-hatred ways. No real way to know the number of white straight men who have committed suicide due to MALCIOUSLY DISHONEST and evil white hating racist white women, but its easily in the tens of millions since WW2.

If Europe, white people and “non-white moral soul-ego individuals” around the world do not wake up to the maliciously evil soul-ego terrorism that is happening to individual rights fundamentalism as a concept, then Theoretical Human could end up having to reset themselves back to the hunter gatherer days. If trans-prophet Muhammeds terrorist death cult actually took over the world, then it would be in a super race to destroy everything. The only reason some muslim countries appear to not be like Muhammed’s average muslim, is 100% due to non-muslim technology, knowledge, and “non-muslim threat of teaming up against islam” keeps them in check from going 100% full trans-prophet Muhammeds evil terrorist rape slavers. If there are no non-muslims to keep muslims in check, then it will be a race of “purest Muhammed virtue signaling” which means that they will look more and more like ISS, your average muslim, according to the inventor of islam.

The problem though is that islam would not stop with 600’s technology, because 600’s technology was built by non-muslims. “Muhammeds horocrux Koran” is built on slavery and pure delusional fantasy, which means that anyone who does too much objective science or morality that goes beyond Muhammed will be murdered. Anyone who leaves Muhammed will be murdered, because there is nowhere to go that isn’t his death cult. If any tribe starts to move away from Koran, then all the other horcruxes will murder him. If trans-prophet Muhammeds terrorist death cult took over the world because of Marxist systemic racism against whites, then it could mean that Theoretical Human might have to lose all technology and written word, so that Muhammeds horocrux death cult can be wiped away from Theoretical human’s soul-ego completely. Muhammeds death cult is pure emotionally delusion, but it is highly efficient at; identifying non-islam thought/action and neutralizing the individual or using body-ego and soul-ego terrorism to completely force the human to fall back in line with islam.

Anti-white racism might force Theoretical Human to have a 30,000+ year reset of all soul-ego and body-ego technology and knowledge. The obviously huge problem with a reset for Theoretical Human, is the fact that there is a strong likely hood of another Muhammed-type of human and death cult taking hold again, since it happened before. And like before Theoretical Human will have to face that evil threat with zero knowledge of it and the degree of evil narcissistic lying pedophile terrorist that that type of individual is.

One evil example of Europe’s “white hating racism” is what has been going on in England and the “industrial scale rape of little white girls” over the last couple decades. The EVIL Marxist/socialist/racism scum have LITERALLY been protecting a “racist pedophile death cult of terrorist” who LITERALLY STALK little white girls in broad day light, and the communist government protects it. 100% PURE EVIL. United Kingdom has been at civil war for decades and they are only now beginning to realize it.

This is why it is important to be fact based, otherwise you end up “social credit murdering” the most moral people in Theoretical Human, like Tommy Robinson and DouglasMan.