Everyone Fails to Set Up the Morality Co

Everyone Fails to Set Up the Morality Conversation Correctly

Morality = principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.

Everyone today fails to set up the morality conversation in a real morality-based way. Everyone fails before they begin. Everyone starts the conversation in the middle of the moral math equation, and they never define their foundation in any real physics and evolutionary based way. Metaphorically, they claim to have a conversation about “optimal skyscraper buildings” and begin the conversation on the tenth floor, while never breaking down all the inherent fundamental 1st principle pieces that allows for that tenth floor to exist. They stay in between floors 7 and 12 and pat themselves on the back for “attempting” to do something good, even though there was no real attempt at understanding the topic for real. “Attempting” to have a real conversation about sky scraper buildings, but only staying between floors 7 to 12, is the same thing as claiming that you “attempted” to pick up an attractive celebrity to have a family with, because you went into your bedroom, “skipped to the 7th floor of the sky scraper talk” aka you imagined yourself already dating this person, and then you masturbated alone with them in your head.

99% of humans who have morality conversations are doing so for “intellectual masturbation porn” and they sell it as entertainment, mostly.

First off, judging morality today is different than judging morality 2,000 years ago, because humans did not have enough total objective knowledge about reality to correctly discover the optimal moral principles for human individuals and society. For example, 2,000 years ago it would not be correct to label an “IGS” believer as morally ill in their mindset, because they simply did not have enough knowledge objectively back then to tell the difference between “fantasy and reality.” Humans 2,000 years ago, having their morality based in fantasy beliefs, which were contained into judgements about the real world and real humans, in ways which were based on the objective knowledge or views that they had at that time period, WAS OPTIMAL for humans back in history.

This is a point that I want to make very clear, it was OPTIMAL and 100% needed for humans to switch from “real reality-based hunter gatherer morality” to a “fantasy belief based moral system” because it allowed for all individual humans to have moral concepts and moral metaphors that allowed for humans to build larger societies. Most humans do not primary care about morality. Most humans primarily care about “how moral the tribe/society perceives them to be.” In order for human societies to grow bigger and allow for knowledge, skill, exploration, and technology specialization, humans HAD to INVERT MORALITY to FANTASY, so that the mad mob of humans who are EMOTIONALISM ADDICTS, would have “moral mind bumper lanes” to keep them from being worse than they would be, if they did not have those “soul moral bumper lanes.”

It is hard to know exactly what percent of humans value morality as a primary vs a 2ndary need vehicle to have positive moral currency in the tribe’s eyes, but the number of humans who value morality 100% primary, is probably less than 5%, unfortunately. The deeper into the moral math of human nature that I went, the further and further away from me, others wanted to be. The two main reasons that it appeared to be that made others run from moral math fundamentals, was insecurity with themselves, insecurity with how society would view them, and a complete lack of moral pettiness and moral ambition aka “lazy mother fuckers who do NOT give a fuck about anything too challenging.” They want something that challenges them enough to say that they were challenged, but they have zero desire to be anywhere near the challenge level taken on by top 1% of human individuals.

Today, humans do have enough objective knowledge about reality to know that IGS is morally ill mindset, given the fact that there is zero evidence for any supernaturalism, and we have objective knowledge to understand our real objective reality universe. It is hard to say when exactly humans had enough objective knowledge to discover real physics and evolution based morally optimal principles, but my best guess is the 1990’s. Real optimal moral principles for humans begins with knowing the difference between reality and fantasy, because only with real reality based moral principles, is an individual rights fundamentalist able to be emotionally sober in their overall life moral mindset, when making decisions. This does NOT mean that an individual does not experience emotions or process them in healthy ways. It means that an individual uses their real moral principles-based mindset to handle the 24/7 emotions that social animals experience, in a morally optimal way for themselves, their valued humans, their community, and theoretical human overall.

It is time to “Revert Retarded Immoral Mindsets Back to REAL Reality” because Theoretical Humans will NEVER have an optimal moral individual rights based moral society, until it leaves the EMOTIONALISM ADDICTION immoral mindset in the past.

All individuals who are based in fantasy (supernaturalism that they have zero real facts for) and all secular emotionalist with emotional life purposes/goals, always end up EMOTIONALLY BLACKED OUT and BELLIGERENT because of their emotionalism addiction.

I have ZERO beliefs and emotionalism in my overall real moral principles’ worldview and mindset for the individual human and theoretical human. This is the most important foundational position that the reader needs to understand moving forward, otherwise everything I say will sink in emotionalism quicksand, inside your head. I am NOT belief based. Calling my moral code a belief is 100% dishonest and slanderous. I am NOT belief based at all. 100% real physics and evolution based moral principles and moral mindset. ZERO BELIEFS. I’m 100% CORRECT about the optimally real moral principles and values for Theoretical Human, in same way that “1+1=2.”

The idea that human morality is not objective is 100% immoral and incorrect. All evolved animals have an objective nature that ties them to our physics-based reality, otherwise that animal dies. This does not mean that humans are identical, because evolution is literally tiny mutations and changes, so evolutionally there are going to be slight differences always. Also, just because one person writes to process their emotions, verse another individual using surfing to process their emotions, this does not mean human nature is not fundamentally objective. It means that humans have different lives, different experiences, everyone is unique, and so all humans have an objective foundational nature, as well as individual specific interests and experiences for which to process and experience their objective human nature. Objective foundation, with objective individual strategies to process our objective nature, because everyone is unique DNA wise and personal experience of life.

Beliefs and Emotional Goals will ALWAYS lead to EMOTIONALISM ADDICTION; emotionalism blacked out, emotional abuse to self and others, and the destruction of human moral potentional for the individual and society as a whole, aka “all future individual humans yet to be born into the society that we leave them.” The age of beliefs and emotionalism is over, because it is the ANTI-optimal moral individual code for the individual and theoretical human. Emotionalism addiction is ALWAYS win-lose mindset immoral slavery.

For Theoretical Human to have real win-win individual rights fundamentalism moral principles, it has to be understood that human nature is objective and that objective moral principles is optimal for human beings.

Point of Morality = To optimize Theoretical Human society in a way that allows the individual human to have their best chance to max out their life’s potential to survive, then thrive to their max level desired, based on their personal ability and ambition.

This is the first time that humans have an objective real physics and evolution based focal point for theoretical human and each individual to shoot for. In order for an individual to have an emotionally sober moral mindset, they need to have their entire moral framework be objectively real reality based, which 100% includes the focal point for each individual human to use as their “north star” guiding their long-term life strategy. HumanVerse’s moral code has the individual focus on maxing out their individual life potential, because it allows the individual the best chance they have to achieve the goals they desire, once they know more specifically the area of life they want to pursue.

One example to help clarify is, I want you to max out who you are, rather than focusing on finding a “soul mate.” It is 100% irrational to believe that you are so rare and unique that out of all the humans in the world, only one is a really great fit. That is an example of an emotional belief and immoral/irrational mindset toward your life and human life in general. HumanVerse’s moral code encourages the individual to max out their attractive score, because doing that allows you more moral choices. Focus on increasing your objective real skills, abilities, and overall life, so that your social animal emotional based soul and body stay as consistent as possible.

Every moral ideology before HumanVerse had the point of their morality be very specific supernatural fantasy based in some “trust me bro, believe me” human or secular emotionally based in a feeling like “happiness/well-being/etc.” and both strategies are incorrect and will 100% of the time lead to emotionalism addiction and an emotional individual addict. Many of these current anti-moral options today were needed and optimal at one point in human history. That time has passed though.

Asking someone “what is the point of life?” implies entitlement to infinite possible choices or the idea of one perfect answer. This is 100% delusional and anti-reality/anti-human nature based. Before you ask someone “what’s the point of life?” you have to first define what options are even possible, based on real physics and evolution-based reality.

One of the biggest problems with the conversation of morality, is the idea that morality is “infinite and perfect” or “meaningless and arbitrary” with nothing in between but beliefs, faiths, emotions, and meaningless smug fart self-sniffers. This is 100% immoral mindset and delusionally retarded. Both of those options do NOT LITERALLY EXIST NOR WILL THEY EVER FOR HUMANS. 100% delusionally immoral retardedness. Life consists of the real reality-based options that humans have, not two impossible extreme ends of insanity that are LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

Morality is finite and humans can only choose the options that LITERALLY are possible and real, for that human, based on the specific objective facts of the situation that the human is making the moral judgement.

Pre-Talk Fantasy Failures that Subjective Immoral Mindset Retards, from the RetardedVerse make Before They Even Begin Having the Morality Conversation

Retards believe that “because not everyone makes the right answer, the right answer does not exist.” Someone believing that “1+1 = 34” does not “destroy math having objective reality truths.”
Retards who believe age of consent is arbitrary, because some immoral retarded TRANS-prophet a long time ago said “trust me bro. believe me. And don’t question me bro, just totally trust me, forever.”
1. These retards will try and make the claim that because humans do not have a “perfect answer, always” then “all answers must be meaningless and chosen on a complete non-reality-based emotion” even though emotions and everything humans do IS 100% reality based, even if you consciously attempt to blind yourself and others. They cannot even have the conversation without contradicting themselves.
2. Claiming that something is “arbitrary” unless there is a singular perfect answer, is pure standard RetardedVerse Retardedness. This would mean that scoring a basketball or a soccer ball is “arbitrary” because there is not a singular spot that the ball must go through in order to count. A basketball can be slightly left, right, forward, etc. of rim. A soccer ball can score in the upper left/right, lower left/right, a team can score on itself, etc.
  1. Figuring out the ideal age of consent for humans to be adults, at various points in human history, including today, is not something that humans can be perfect about, because we do not have perfect knowledge, perfect reason, nor is it even possible for finite animals, in a finite physics-based universe to be “perfect.” Humans use the concept of perfection to strive forward towards, but not as a literal concept, at least reason based people do not.
    1. This is an anti-reason/reality/thinking strategy that fantasy based death cult users do to try and justify their desire to rape little girls like the 600’s did. I know Ayn Rand wrote about this “anti-concept” idea.
    2. Humans cannot figure out the “perfect age for adulthood” but humans can make the answer as reality based as possible using reason and facts to eliminate all immoral answers. Humans may not be able to figure out the “literal perfect answer” but humans can eliminate 95% of anti-moral options and then select the fact-based optimal option based on what is left over.
Retards who believe “all answers are equally valid” ignore real physics and evolutionary rules of human nature and objective reality. Reality is real and NOT a “simulation vacuum in fantasia.” Real morality is based on REAL reality rules.
Retards who believe human nature is subjective.
1. Eat, sleep, food, body movement, etc. are all REAL human objective needs.
All Retards who have an emotional or fantasy-based life point/goal, is going to 100% of time end up an emotionalism addict with a win-lose slavery master mindset to “some degree” which varies from individual to individual, as well as from “emotionalism addiction fantasy/emotional ideology” to each other in terms of “ideology addict average.”
Retards who believe that objective morality means that there is only one right objective answer and moral strategy for every situation.
1. Poker players know that they have to balance their range and play hands differently sometimes to disguise strategies.
2. In basketball coaches can use a “zone or man to man” defensive strategy to win their objective goal based game. Both strategies are objective.
Retards who believe that “if 1st evolved humans and humans today do not do the same moral options, then morality is subjective.” These retards believe that morality is some kind of infinite force or substance that is not bound by physics, evolution, or the LITERAL moral options that a human has available to them, when making their moral choice, regardless of the moment in space and time that they made it.
1. Real morality is finite, and a human can only choose from the options that are possible, based on technology, objective knowledge, the environmental variables, etc. Human morality has 3 options: anti-optimal options, general options, and optimal moral options. A human can only make choices based on their options. Humans today have moral options that were not available to 1st evolved human tribes.
Retards who believe that humans are “supernaturally flawed” and always doomed to fail and be anti-moral, forever.
1. One retard said that human nature was the problem. He believed that if human nature was not flawed that it could make individual rights or slavery work (capitalism vs communism), even though they are completely opposite moral codes and 100% contradict what he believes.
Retards do not understand that the “frontal lobe morality war for Theoretical Human” is and always has been going on.
1. World War Zero is raging and has always been raging.
  1. Objective individual rights fundamentalism vs Emotionalism Addiction to Fantasy Non-Reality based beliefs
Retards who believe that we can change/ignore human nature because we do not live in the jungle anymore.
RetardedVerse’s Retards all believe that they have an “alpha level say” in everyone else’s life, because emotionalism addicts are win-lose SLAVERS, with 100% IMMORAL MINDSET and worldview.
Retards who value their emotionalism addiction/heart over physics and evolution-based facts and reason.
Retards who ignore morality all together and act like morality means “weak vs strong.” These people are evil because they 100% ignore social animal internal soul morality all together and judge people based on who is more immoral body ego weak.
1. This type of Retard is best example of the people who support trans-prophet Muhammad death cult of pedophile terrorist in Palestine. Even though they are the ones who are LITERALLY GENOCIDAL in DESIRE and EFFORT, they start the wars and do the terrorism/rape/mass murder/etc., while openly bragging about never stopping until all jews dead, but since TRANS-prophet Muhammeds death cult values deceiving they fake weakness to gain emotionalism support from anti-morality gutless cowards, who ignore morality and defend whoever is immorally weak.
Retards who ignore human nature, physics nature, and pretend like they are a victim with no point to their life.
Retards who believe morality is arbitrary and subjective, believe that there is no moral difference between a doctor who delivers babies and a serial murderer.
Retards who believe that believing in fantasy-based characters that they have zero evidence for, somehow magically gives their special soul emotionalism “special powers of being real morally.”
1. Real morality is based on real facts. No real facts, no real objective morality.
2. Moderates are Retards who believe that an imperfect book character, is perfect, because they believe it is so. Moderates do not understand that they are claiming to be PERFECT DIVINE PROPHETS.
  1. They have perfect moral superiority and ability to perfectly know what is perfectly divine, even though the people who told them about this fantasy god and supposedly talked to them (trust me bro) do not even have that ability. The moderate claims to be perfectly morally divine, while at the same time, they are perfectly humble, and they believe real morality-based people “are narcissistic.”