Inherent Laws of Human Morality

Inherent Laws of Human Morality and Why “Critics” Pretend They Don’t Exist

Theodore Roosevelt’s Poem “Man in the Arena” Explains Why Anti-Morality Mindsets Persists

Teddy Roosevelt wrote a poem about one of Theoretical Human’s biggest problems, which is most humans are “moral communist” looking for pretend handout credit that is far more than what they objectively deserve. The worst part is that these people try and convince others that they deserve full moral credit, while 100% rejecting ALL moral accountability. Teddy called these people “the critic” and pointed out that they do not matter. The only one or ones that matter, are the human individuals who are ACTUALLY “In the arena.”

The thing that makes the critic most evil, is the fact that they care more about “NOT LOSING” than they do about accomplishing something. In their head they are emotionally perfect, and they cannot handle anything less, so they run away from ever doing the problem solving themselves or entering the arena themselves. Instead, they yell from the stands and demand a headset connection to the players in the game. These people will tell you that they are better at basketball and football, than Michael Jordan and Tom Brady, because they have zero turnovers in the NBA and zero interceptions in the NFL.

These people are ANTI-morality altogether, because if morality exists, then that means that there is a difference between the pro-athlete and the armchair quarterbacks across the globe. These people are anti-moral because real optimal objective morality existing would mean that those people who make them morally insecure, are probably morally superior to them in their overall moral life mindset, principles, effort, pettiness, ambition, etc.

The Critic desires to destroy the “Man in the Arena’s potential” so that they appear closer than they are. Rather than using that energy to optimize themselves and just be happy for Theoretical Human having such awesome overall potential, they use their energy to DESTROY the best humans, which means they are harming ALL SOCIETY and ALL HUMANS. They are the “Wackiest Racer Dick Dastardly and his sidekick Muttley” using all their efforts to be IMmoral or ANTI-moral, rather than using that effort to optimize their own life.

The Critic ALWAYS end up ANTI-moral, GUTLESS COWARDS, who look for EVERY ANTI-problem-solving reason why you or others are wrong, but they would be perfect, because in their fantasy delusions they are. When you ask them to personally describe their real-world moral principles, they gaslight you for even asking, as if they deserve DIVINE IMMUNITY from having their morality questioned. They will even likely call you a narcissist, even though they are acting morally superior as if they are a cop/judge, except that they do not need to describe what moral laws or principles were violated. “The Critic” mindset perfectly describes “Marxist sCHoLArs.”

“The Critic” is a Yeast Infection “Yellow Pussy”

List of All the Inherent Physics and Evolutionary Laws that Assholes and Pussies Ignore

Physics’ objective laws of REAL reality, in our Universe.
Evolution’s moral laws -All animals have an objective animal nature that ties them to physics based reality.
Morality is about “good vs bad” for humans, which means it is intended to figure out what is objectively optimally GOOD for humans to FURTHER HUMAN LIFE.
Morality is about “morally worthy human life verse morally Unworthy human life.” If all human “worthiness” was the same, regardless of mindset, values, actions, etc., then that would destroy the very foundational point and concept of morality itself.
Morality is based on THIS human life, which means that REAL OBJECTIVE OPTIMAL MORAL PRINCIPLES are based on facts of reality. If there are no facts for it, then it’s a guess. There is zero evidence for anything outside of our universe, before human life begins, or after human life ends. We have zero facts to know anything for sure, so everything is a GUESS. Real morality does not deal with guesses.
Objective reality and human life is NOT infinite, but Critics act like human morality is infinite. That’s retarded as fuck. If reality and human nature’s life cycle is finite, then human morality is finite.
1. Humans cannot choose options that do not exist.
  1. Columbus could not book an airplane to America.
  2. 1st evolved humans could not choose to go to a hospital.
2. Humans get “han-gry” because human nature has limits and if our objective foundational need of food, sex, sleep, are messed with, then our “human moral potential” goes down.
  1. FINITE HUMAN MORALITY
    1. Optimal moral options.
    2. General moral options.
    3. ANTI-optimal moral options.
Real objective morality means that there is more than one morally objective option. Real morality does not mean “only one objective option.” That’s fucking retarded as fuck. Evolution is literally small changes, which means not all 100% the same. There is more than one objectively real moral strategy for life’s moral problems.
The fact that it is objectively correct to view morality as a finite and efficiency problem, means that morality can be improved upon. If someone integrates humans with physics and/or evolution in a more efficient/optimal way than all the current moral optimal options in society, then that means that a new optimal moral optimal has been created.
1. This new option will not be available to everyone immediately, but over time it will.
2. The old optimal moral optimal has now become an average/general moral option. Eventually it will even be moved to the anti-moral options pile, until it’s scraped all together for being too inefficient to the optimal options of the day.
Real objective morality depends on the individual’s objective moral knowledge, technology, societal views (safety concerns can limit options), etc., of THAT 100% EXACT MOMENT in the space time continuum. You judge that moral choice based on that individual’s knowledge and options. The only humans that you can judge that human against in an honest and reason-based way, are the humans who lived during that human’s life and the humans in their parent’s generation.
1. An individual cannot make choices based on future knowledge. It is 100% IMMORAL and IRRATIONALLY retarded to judge the past based on today’s standards, which rest on those people advancing human life to make today’s standards possible.
  1. If Theoretical Human history was a sky scrapper, then retards today who try and judge past humans, by todays standards, would be metaphorically the same as someone living on the 69th floor and claiming moral superiority because people on the 42nd floor have worse technology and moral human options when their floor was built. The 42nd floor was a major step forward from floor 41, and floor 69 was not possible without 42’s moral achievement and advancement. Floor 69 has some anti-moral retards living on it, right now. Total Asshole Dum Dums.
Human social animal nature has an individual and a tribal nature. Critics act like this means that they cancel each other out or that there is not a more efficient way to morally gain clarity on how to optimally objectively fact based integrate them.
Real morality is concerned with morality on multiple levels. Real morality is concerned with each individual human’s ability to optimally live their individual life. Real morality is concerned with Theoretical Human’s journey overall as well, down to M3-Infinty (last human).
1. Surviving is of primary importance because without survival there is nothing. Survival needs are primary.
2. Theoretical Human’s future is also primary concern, because a parent is trying to maintain their child’s ability to maintain life, while also trying to improve on their child’s ability to grow up to have more moral potential than them and to have their future tribal society be better than previous generation.
3. Improving morality overall is a process of optimizing human ability to survive to the point that you are able to trade some “survive now-focus, energy, effort, etc.,” for “Long-term thriving improvements of Theoretical Human overall.” Using some “moral survival profit” to invest in “Theoretical Human Thriving.”
Morality is finite and not every human has the same overall moral life potential. To what degree a person uses their moral potential is up to them, but the point is that every human being does not have the same moral life potential.
Charity is NOT moral unless it is done morally. People who “cannot care for themselves enough to survive fully on their own” and who need “charity to maintain life” THEN all of those people should be neutered in order to even be considered for long term charity help.
1. It’s immoral for a person to have a baby when they cannot take care of themselves, because they are now enslaving others to that baby, which is most likely going to have DNA that will not be able to survive on own.
2. Every resource given to charity could have been invested in M3-5.0’s future, where that investment is going to pay off far more MORALLY than using that resource to be consumed today. IF charity is going to be given today, then there better be dam good moral reasons and RECIPEANTS or FUCK OFF.
Moral choices require an individual to be “emotionally sober” when deciding because “emotionally blacked out” individual mindsets cannot emotionalize morality beyond win-lose. Morality requires the individual to be able to connect their primal brain and frontal lobe, for full moral integration.
1. For an individual to be moral, they must have a moral principled system for processing the 24/7 emotions that social animals deal with. If an individual does not confront and deal with their emotions in a moral way, then they will become emotionally constipated and that leads to “mental illness.” 99% of mental illness, is really just ANTI-optimal moral mindset.
2. If optimal objective morality requires the frontal lobe and the primal brain to have full connection, then that objectively means that there has to be some kind of pattern or system that can be discovered/created to optimize the individual’s ability to maintain that connection, despite what reality has happening.
  1. The ability to connect the primal brain and frontal lobe could be viewed as a “Goldie locks zone” which can be primed, trained, and have its potential increased.
    1. Meditation can increase an individual’s ability to focus mind over feelings.
    2. Wim Hoff Cold Baths that force the body ego into “fight/flight” mode can be used to train the minds ability to stay focused and think through problems with an emotionally sober moral mindset.
There is no morality if humans do not have free will. Humans do have free will and they do need it for morality to even exist.
1. This means that to be truly 100% moral, an individual needs to live in an individual rights fundamentalist society, where individuals have 100% moral free will to dictate their moral life path forward.
2. A slave has the ability to be moral, but a slave’s “moral range” of “moral options” is vastly limited by their specific slavery conditions.
Morality is finite and depends on the objective conditions of the environment and human society that an individual is in. An individual can be in a situation where they have moral options that are win-win or an individual can be in an environment that only has win-lose situations.
1. In a win-lose situation that pits two people against each other, it is moral for each person to fight for their win.
Real morality REQUIRES 24/7 judgement of oneself, others, and everything overall that is involved in life, because you need updated facts about people and whether they are moral or not, as well as what are best options in life environment.
1. People hate the idea of judging themselves or others. This is a retarded and cowardly irrational view. It is a complete rejection and projection of moral accountability onto other people. You LITERALLY cannot be moral without taking moral accountability. Rejecting moral accountability is anti-moral cowardice.
  1. Vast majority of humans are super insecure with who they are and their life potential, so they do not want to know how vast the difference is between them and others, so they maliciously and dishonestly pretend like everything is the same, even though it is clearly not.
  2. People know that judging others means standing out for that judgement, as well as inviting others to judge you, which is something that most people are terrified of. Most humans value their appearance to the tribe over being moral, so they stay in the shadows and hide most of life.
    1. Japan has a saying, “The nail that sticks out gets hammered.”
  3. All fantasy based immoral ideologies and most secular emotionalism based immoral ideologies have retardedly inverted views on judgement, so that the tribe or the cult leader remains on top and everyone else is beneath them. These immoral ideologies discourage others to think 100% and bet on their own brain 100%.
    1. If you are not living based on your brain, then who’s brain is living your life?
Before Theoretical Human can revert to Reality and real moral principles, it is going to have to revert the view that it currently has on judging others and selfishness. Real optimally objective morality can ONLY start with REASON based selfishness, focused on win-win relationships. Humans can only know if something is reason based or irrational, if humans use their brain to think and judge. Humans judge all the time, but the idea of giving a god or the tribe credit has become so standard that the entire RetardedVerse is all blind Retards without the ability to see beyond this hypocrisy. The RetardedVerse’s retardedness blinds retards to their immorality.
Theoretical Human will not have an optimally objective moral win-win society for M3-Infinity, until its moral leaders and educators spread the optimally correct moral individual rights principles for all humans.
1. Optimal objective morality is real.
2. Reason based selfishness is the ONLY correct starting place for real morality.
3. Reason based judgement on real facts of reality is 100% necessary for morality. Optimal morality 100% has to be VOLITIONAL CHOOSEN and people won’t do that unless they judge reality and everyone in it.
4. Theoretical Human’s right to win-win society is #1 overall most important real moral goal for humans, because it is the only way to end the current global Theoretical Human frontal lobe morality war that has been going on since humans evolved.
Real morality means that a person has to DESIRE that. A person cannot be moral if they do not care about morality, or they reject moral accountability for their life.